PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XQB.TO vs. XBB.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

XQB.TO vs. XBB.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares High Quality Canadian Bond Index ETF (XQB.TO) and iShares Core Canadian Universe Bond Index ETF (XBB.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

XQB.TO vs. XBB.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XQB.TO
iShares High Quality Canadian Bond Index ETF
0.11%3.16%4.17%6.51%-10.61%-2.84%8.32%6.05%1.38%1.61%
XBB.TO
iShares Core Canadian Universe Bond Index ETF
0.06%2.59%4.00%6.64%-11.66%-2.81%8.58%7.28%1.00%2.42%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XQB.TO achieves a 0.11% return, which is significantly higher than XBB.TO's 0.06% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with XQB.TO having a 1.67% annualized return and XBB.TO not far behind at 1.65%.


XQB.TO

1D
0.27%
1M
-1.85%
YTD
0.11%
6M
0.01%
1Y
0.93%
3Y*
3.66%
5Y*
0.81%
10Y*
1.67%

XBB.TO

1D
0.25%
1M
-1.99%
YTD
0.06%
6M
-0.33%
1Y
0.67%
3Y*
3.35%
5Y*
0.56%
10Y*
1.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


XQB.TO vs. XBB.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XQB.TO has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is higher than XBB.TO's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

XQB.TO vs. XBB.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XQB.TO
XQB.TO Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
XQB.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XQB.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
XQB.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
XQB.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
XQB.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

XBB.TO
XBB.TO Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
XBB.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XBB.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
XBB.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
XBB.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
XBB.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XQB.TO vs. XBB.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares High Quality Canadian Bond Index ETF (XQB.TO) and iShares Core Canadian Universe Bond Index ETF (XBB.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XQB.TOXBB.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.22

0.14

+0.08

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.32

0.22

+0.10

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.03

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.68

0.36

+0.32

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.56

0.73

+0.84

XQB.TO vs. XBB.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XQB.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.22, which is higher than the XBB.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XQB.TO and XBB.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XQB.TOXBB.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

0.14

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

0.09

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

0.25

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.71

-0.18

Correlation

The correlation between XQB.TO and XBB.TO is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

XQB.TO vs. XBB.TO - Dividend Comparison

XQB.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.43%, which matches XBB.TO's 3.43% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
XQB.TO
iShares High Quality Canadian Bond Index ETF
3.43%3.39%3.24%2.93%2.75%2.37%2.37%2.53%2.59%2.54%2.67%2.80%
XBB.TO
iShares Core Canadian Universe Bond Index ETF
3.43%3.39%3.25%3.01%2.91%2.54%2.55%2.80%2.92%2.83%2.81%2.87%

Drawdowns

XQB.TO vs. XBB.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XQB.TO drawdown since its inception was -16.57%, smaller than the maximum XBB.TO drawdown of -18.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XQB.TO and XBB.TO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


XQB.TOXBB.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.57%

-18.16%

+1.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.70%

-2.83%

+0.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.59%

-15.90%

+1.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.57%

-18.16%

+1.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.85%

-2.79%

+0.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.09%

-2.77%

-0.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.17%

1.40%

-0.23%

Volatility

XQB.TO vs. XBB.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares High Quality Canadian Bond Index ETF (XQB.TO) is 1.86%, while iShares Core Canadian Universe Bond Index ETF (XBB.TO) has a volatility of 2.00%. This indicates that XQB.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XBB.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


XQB.TOXBB.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.86%

2.00%

-0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.80%

3.09%

-0.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.26%

4.73%

-0.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.86%

6.60%

-0.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.77%

6.68%

-0.91%