CLG.TO vs. SRU-UN.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares 1-10 Year Laddered Government Bond Index ETF (CLG.TO) and SmartCentres Real Estate Investment Trust (SRU-UN.TO).
CLG.TO is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Morningstar Can Core Bd GR CAD. It was launched on Oct 20, 2011.
Performance
CLG.TO vs. SRU-UN.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CLG.TO vs. SRU-UN.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLG.TO iShares 1-10 Year Laddered Government Bond Index ETF | 0.35% | 3.35% | 4.30% | 4.82% | -6.21% | -2.23% | 6.66% | 3.40% | 1.69% | -0.02% |
SRU-UN.TO SmartCentres Real Estate Investment Trust | 6.74% | 13.10% | 6.13% | 0.16% | -11.27% | 48.64% | -19.65% | 6.97% | 5.77% | 1.14% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CLG.TO achieves a 0.35% return, which is significantly lower than SRU-UN.TO's 6.74% return. Over the past 10 years, CLG.TO has underperformed SRU-UN.TO with an annualized return of 1.53%, while SRU-UN.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 4.40% annualized return.
CLG.TO
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- -1.32%
- YTD
- 0.35%
- 6M
- 0.29%
- 1Y
- 1.64%
- 3Y*
- 3.40%
- 5Y*
- 1.30%
- 10Y*
- 1.53%
SRU-UN.TO
- 1D
- 1.43%
- 1M
- -1.78%
- YTD
- 6.74%
- 6M
- 4.42%
- 1Y
- 13.69%
- 3Y*
- 8.34%
- 5Y*
- 7.30%
- 10Y*
- 4.40%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CLG.TO vs. SRU-UN.TO — Risk / Return Rank
CLG.TO
SRU-UN.TO
CLG.TO vs. SRU-UN.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares 1-10 Year Laddered Government Bond Index ETF (CLG.TO) and SmartCentres Real Estate Investment Trust (SRU-UN.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CLG.TO | SRU-UN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.54 | 1.07 | -0.53 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.73 | 1.55 | -0.82 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.19 | -0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.94 | 2.29 | -1.35 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.26 | 6.20 | -3.94 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CLG.TO | SRU-UN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 | 1.07 | -0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 | 0.45 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 | 0.21 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 0.35 | +0.18 |
Correlation
The correlation between CLG.TO and SRU-UN.TO is 0.14, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
CLG.TO vs. SRU-UN.TO - Dividend Comparison
CLG.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.55%, less than SRU-UN.TO's 6.84% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLG.TO iShares 1-10 Year Laddered Government Bond Index ETF | 2.55% | 2.54% | 2.53% | 2.51% | 2.55% | 2.61% | 2.59% | 2.88% | 3.02% | 3.17% | 3.25% | 3.34% |
SRU-UN.TO SmartCentres Real Estate Investment Trust | 6.84% | 7.18% | 7.56% | 7.42% | 6.90% | 5.74% | 8.01% | 5.81% | 5.72% | 5.55% | 5.17% | 5.34% |
Drawdowns
CLG.TO vs. SRU-UN.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CLG.TO drawdown since its inception was -10.74%, smaller than the maximum SRU-UN.TO drawdown of -68.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLG.TO and SRU-UN.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CLG.TO | SRU-UN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.74% | -68.25% | +57.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.93% | -6.39% | +4.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -9.96% | -28.89% | +18.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -10.74% | -54.78% | +44.04% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.32% | -2.71% | +1.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.01% | -11.06% | +9.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.80% | 2.36% | -1.56% |
Volatility
CLG.TO vs. SRU-UN.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares 1-10 Year Laddered Government Bond Index ETF (CLG.TO) is 1.31%, while SmartCentres Real Estate Investment Trust (SRU-UN.TO) has a volatility of 3.81%. This indicates that CLG.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SRU-UN.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CLG.TO | SRU-UN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.31% | 3.81% | -2.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.03% | 8.51% | -6.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.06% | 12.85% | -9.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.27% | 16.24% | -11.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.32% | 21.57% | -17.25% |