XQB.TO vs. XGRO.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares High Quality Canadian Bond Index ETF (XQB.TO) and iShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio (XGRO.TO).
XQB.TO and XGRO.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XQB.TO is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Morningstar Can Core Bd GR CAD. It was launched on Nov 19, 2009. XGRO.TO is an actively managed fund by iShares. It was launched on Jun 21, 2007.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: XQB.TO or XGRO.TO.
Key characteristics
| XQB.TO | XGRO.TO | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 4.24% | 19.85% |
| 1Y Return | 9.97% | 26.75% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 0.39% | 6.78% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 0.84% | 9.72% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 2.00% | 8.35% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.09 | 3.49 |
| Sortino Ratio | 3.20 | 5.01 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.38 | 1.67 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.88 | 5.43 |
| Martin Ratio | 8.67 | 28.15 |
| Ulcer Index | 1.36% | 0.99% |
| Daily Std Dev | 5.54% | 7.94% |
| Max Drawdown | -16.57% | -47.93% |
| Current Drawdown | -3.88% | 0.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between XQB.TO and XGRO.TO is 0.58, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
XQB.TO vs. XGRO.TO - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, XQB.TO achieves a 4.24% return, which is significantly lower than XGRO.TO's 19.85% return. Over the past 10 years, XQB.TO has underperformed XGRO.TO with an annualized return of 2.00%, while XGRO.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 8.35% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XQB.TO vs. XGRO.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
XQB.TO has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than XGRO.TO's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
XQB.TO vs. XGRO.TO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares High Quality Canadian Bond Index ETF (XQB.TO) and iShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio (XGRO.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
XQB.TO vs. XGRO.TO - Dividend Comparison
XQB.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.17%, more than XGRO.TO's 2.04% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XQB.TO iShares High Quality Canadian Bond Index ETF | 3.17% | 2.93% | 2.75% | 2.37% | 2.37% | 2.53% | 2.59% | 2.54% | 2.67% | 2.80% | 2.94% | 8.49% |
XGRO.TO iShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio | 2.04% | 2.27% | 1.89% | 1.69% | 1.98% | 2.25% | 7.56% | 2.08% | 2.70% | 2.19% | 5.71% | 1.66% |
Drawdowns
XQB.TO vs. XGRO.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XQB.TO drawdown since its inception was -16.57%, smaller than the maximum XGRO.TO drawdown of -47.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XQB.TO and XGRO.TO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
XQB.TO vs. XGRO.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares High Quality Canadian Bond Index ETF (XQB.TO) is 2.29%, while iShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio (XGRO.TO) has a volatility of 2.55%. This indicates that XQB.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XGRO.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.