PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CLFD vs. CRDO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CLFD vs. CRDO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Clearfield, Inc. (CLFD) and Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd (CRDO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLFD achieves a 37.26% return, which is significantly lower than CRDO's 110.24% return.


CLFD

1D
-1.09%
1M
-8.51%
YTD
37.26%
6M
37.97%
1Y
0.00%
3Y*
-4.44%
5Y*
2.21%
10Y*
8.46%

CRDO

1D
11.29%
1M
38.51%
YTD
110.24%
6M
101.76%
1Y
253.78%
3Y*
158.86%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CLFD vs. CRDO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
CLFD
Clearfield, Inc.
37.26%-5.97%6.60%-69.11%87.42%
CRDO
Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd
110.24%114.09%245.20%46.28%10.00%

Correlation

The correlation between CLFD and CRDO is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2022

0.33

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CLFD:

$546.96M

CRDO:

$58.29B

EPS

CLFD:

-$0.62

CRDO:

$2.50

PS Ratio

CLFD:

4.06

CRDO:

42.88

PB Ratio

CLFD:

2.25

CRDO:

28.25

Total Revenue (TTM)

CLFD:

$136.22M

CRDO:

$1.34B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CLFD:

$50.71M

CRDO:

$908.35M

EBITDA (TTM)

CLFD:

$11.00M

CRDO:

$463.79M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CLFD vs. CRDO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLFD
CLFD Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
CLFD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CLFD Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
CLFD Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
CLFD Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
CLFD Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

CRDO
CRDO Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
CRDO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRDO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRDO Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
CRDO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRDO Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CLFD vs. CRDO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Clearfield, Inc. (CLFD) and Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd (CRDO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CLFDCRDODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.95

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.36

-0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.00

4.77

-4.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.00

11.50

-11.50

CLFD vs. CRDO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CLFD Sharpe Ratio is 0.00, which is lower than the CRDO Sharpe Ratio of 2.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLFD and CRDO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CLFD vs. CRDO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLFD drawdown since its inception was -98.62%, which is greater than CRDO's maximum drawdown of -62.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLFD and CRDO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CLFDCRDODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.62%

-62.04%

-36.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-42.66%

-53.59%

+10.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-53.17%

-61.05%

+7.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-82.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-82.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-69.60%

0.00%

-69.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-63.01%

-19.31%

-43.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

27.69%

22.18%

+5.51%

Volatility

CLFD vs. CRDO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Clearfield, Inc. (CLFD) is 22.49%, while Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd (CRDO) has a volatility of 27.04%. This indicates that CLFD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CRDO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CLFDCRDODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

22.49%

27.04%

-4.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

43.94%

66.46%

-22.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

59.18%

86.84%

-27.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

56.96%

81.71%

-24.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

52.44%

81.71%

-29.27%

Dividends

CLFD vs. CRDO - Dividend Comparison

Neither CLFD nor CRDO has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

CLFD vs. CRDO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Clearfield, Inc. and Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M20222023202420252026
34.39M
437.00M
(CLFD) Total Revenue
(CRDO) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CLFD vs. CRDO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Clearfield, Inc. and Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%20222023202420252026
32.5%
68.2%
Portfolio components
CLFD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Clearfield, Inc. reported a gross profit of 11.16M and revenue of 34.39M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 32.5%.

CRDO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd reported a gross profit of 298.07M and revenue of 437.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 68.2%.

CLFD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Clearfield, Inc. reported an operating income of -2.07M and revenue of 34.39M, resulting in an operating margin of -6.0%.

CRDO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd reported an operating income of 155.85M and revenue of 437.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 35.7%.

CLFD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Clearfield, Inc. reported a net income of -528.00K and revenue of 34.39M, resulting in a net margin of -1.5%.

CRDO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd reported a net income of 169.10M and revenue of 437.00M, resulting in a net margin of 38.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CLFD and CRDO have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CRDO has higher volatility (27.04%) compared to CLFD (22.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CLFD dropped -98.62% vs CRDO's -62.04%.

CRDO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.95 vs 0.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CLFD and CRDO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer