PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CLFD vs. BKTI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CLFD vs. BKTI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Clearfield, Inc. (CLFD) and BK Technologies Corporation (BKTI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLFD achieves a 3.81% return, which is significantly lower than BKTI's 7.25% return. Over the past 10 years, CLFD has underperformed BKTI with an annualized return of 4.57%, while BKTI has yielded a comparatively higher 14.26% annualized return.


CLFD

1D
-2.04%
1M
-10.92%
6M
1.65%
YTD
3.81%
1Y
-25.85%
3Y*
-12.99%
5Y*
-7.01%
10Y*
4.57%
ALL TIME*
7.48%

BKTI

1D
0.16%
1M
-5.49%
6M
4.88%
YTD
7.25%
1Y
112.65%
3Y*
77.50%
5Y*
39.26%
10Y*
14.26%
ALL TIME*
16.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$3.07M$3.53M$3.65M
$6.52M$6.26M$12.50M

CLFD vs. BKTI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CLFD
Clearfield, Inc.
3.81%-5.97%6.60%-69.11%11.51%241.50%77.33%40.52%-19.02%-40.82%
BKTI
BK Technologies Corporation
7.25%117.53%180.39%-26.33%44.63%-19.08%1.51%-16.07%7.84%-22.65%

Correlation

The correlation between CLFD and BKTI is 0.34, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.23

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2001

0.10

Over the past year, CLFD and BKTI have become more correlated (0.34) than their long-term average of 0.10, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CLFD:

$411.22M

BKTI:

$299.54M

EPS

CLFD:

-$0.62

BKTI:

$3.57

PS Ratio

CLFD:

3.07

BKTI:

4.73

PB Ratio

CLFD:

1.70

BKTI:

6.72

Total Revenue (TTM)

CLFD:

$136.22M

BKTI:

$67.09M

Gross Profit (TTM)

CLFD:

$50.71M

BKTI:

$22.81M

EBITDA (TTM)

CLFD:

$11.00M

BKTI:

$17.71M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CLFD vs. BKTI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CLFD
CLFD Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
CLFD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CLFD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
CLFD Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
CLFD Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
CLFD Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

BKTI
BKTI Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
BKTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKTI Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
BKTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKTI Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CLFD vs. BKTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Clearfield, Inc. (CLFD) and BK Technologies Corporation (BKTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CLFDBKTIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.95

1.33

-0.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.73

4.11

-4.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.08

8.84

-9.92

CLFD vs. BKTI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CLFD Sharpe Ratio is -0.50, which is lower than the BKTI Sharpe Ratio of 1.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLFD and BKTI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CLFD vs. BKTI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLFD drawdown since its inception was -98.62%, roughly equal to the maximum BKTI drawdown of -95.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLFD and BKTI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CLFDBKTIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.62%

-95.29%

-3.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-42.43%

-25.95%

-16.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-43.39%

-34.91%

-8.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-82.52%

-53.98%

-28.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-82.52%

-77.36%

-5.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-77.01%

-17.48%

-59.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-63.04%

-56.27%

-6.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

28.63%

12.03%

+16.60%

Volatility

CLFD vs. BKTI - Volatility Comparison

Clearfield, Inc. (CLFD) has a higher volatility of 19.75% compared to BK Technologies Corporation (BKTI) at 12.30%. This indicates that CLFD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BKTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CLFDBKTIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.75%

12.30%

+7.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

47.30%

32.27%

+15.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

61.98%

65.91%

-3.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

56.75%

69.49%

-12.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

52.78%

64.92%

-12.14%

Dividends

CLFD vs. BKTI - Dividend Comparison

Neither CLFD nor BKTI has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BKTI
BK Technologies Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%3.61%2.49%3.30%1.94%2.13%4.23%5.68%
CLFD
Clearfield, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

CLFD vs. BKTI - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Clearfield, Inc. and BK Technologies Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


CLFD and BKTI have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CLFD has higher volatility (19.75%) compared to BKTI (12.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CLFD dropped -98.62% vs BKTI's -95.29%.

BKTI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.62 vs -0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CLFD and BKTI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer