CLFD vs. SWKS

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CLFD (Clearfield, Inc.) and SWKS (Skyworks Solutions, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Technology sector — CLFD in Communication Equipment, SWKS in Semiconductors. Over the past 10 years, CLFD returned 9.51%/yr vs 4.15%/yr for SWKS. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

CLFD vs. SWKS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Clearfield, Inc. (CLFD) and Skyworks Solutions, Inc. (SWKS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLFD achieves a 54.82% return, which is significantly higher than SWKS's 29.85% return. Over the past 10 years, CLFD has outperformed SWKS with an annualized return of 9.51%, while SWKS has yielded a comparatively lower 4.15% annualized return.

CLFD

• 1D: -6.35%
• 1M: 53.66%
• YTD: 54.82%
• 6M: 59.53%
• 1Y: 17.53%
• 3Y*: 3.53%
• 5Y*: 1.19%
• 10Y*: 9.51%

SWKS

• 1D: 1.95%
• 1M: 18.17%
• YTD: 29.85%
• 6M: 18.70%
• 1Y: 18.33%
• 3Y*: -5.23%
• 5Y*: -11.38%
• 10Y*: 4.15%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CLFD vs. SWKS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CLFD Clearfield, Inc.	54.82%	-5.97%	6.60%	-69.11%	11.51%	241.50%	77.33%	40.52%	-19.02%	-40.82%
SWKS Skyworks Solutions, Inc.	29.85%	-25.49%	-18.86%	26.55%	-39.95%	2.73%	28.36%	84.10%	-28.30%	28.69%

Correlation

The correlation between CLFD and SWKS is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.25
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.38
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.44
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.39
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 8, 1986	0.15

The correlation between CLFD and SWKS shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (all time) to 0.44 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap CLFD : $616.95M SWKS : $12.14B
EPS CLFD : -$0.62 SWKS : $2.38
PS Ratio CLFD : 4.58 SWKS : 3.02
PB Ratio CLFD : 2.54 SWKS : 2.11
Total Revenue (TTM) CLFD : $136.22M SWKS : $4.04B
Gross Profit (TTM) CLFD : $50.71M SWKS : $1.66B
EBITDA (TTM) CLFD : $11.00M SWKS : $621.40M

Return for Risk

CLFD vs. SWKS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLFD

CLFD Risk / Return Rank: 50
CLFD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
CLFD Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
CLFD Omega Ratio Rank: 52
CLFD Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
CLFD Martin Ratio Rank: 48

SWKS

SWKS Risk / Return Rank: 52
SWKS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
SWKS Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
SWKS Omega Ratio Rank: 51
SWKS Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
SWKS Martin Ratio Rank: 51

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CLFD vs. SWKS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Clearfield, Inc. (CLFD) and Skyworks Solutions, Inc. (SWKS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CLFD	SWKS	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.31	0.45	-0.14
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.84	0.90	-0.06
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.12	1.12	0.00
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.41	0.52	-0.11
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.64	0.97	-0.32
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CLFD vs. SWKS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CLFD Sharpe Ratio is 0.31, which is lower than the SWKS Sharpe Ratio of 0.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLFD and SWKS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CLFD	SWKS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.31	0.45	-0.14
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.02	-0.28	+0.30
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.18	0.10	+0.08
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.12	0.11	+0.01

Drawdowns

CLFD vs. SWKS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLFD drawdown since its inception was -98.62%, roughly equal to the maximum SWKS drawdown of -96.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLFD and SWKS.

Drawdown Indicators

	CLFD	SWKS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-98.62%	-96.12%	-2.50%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-42.66%	-35.24%	-7.42%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-54.04%	-58.20%	+4.16%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-82.52%	-72.55%	-9.97%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-82.52%	-72.88%	-9.64%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-65.71%	-53.20%	-12.51%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-63.00%	-55.75%	-7.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	27.27%	19.00%	+8.27%

Volatility

CLFD vs. SWKS - Volatility Comparison

Clearfield, Inc. (CLFD) has a higher volatility of 32.67% compared to Skyworks Solutions, Inc. (SWKS) at 22.62%. This indicates that CLFD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SWKS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CLFD	SWKS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	32.67%	22.62%	+10.05%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	42.10%	33.61%	+8.49%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	57.59%	41.08%	+16.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	57.22%	40.42%	+16.80%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	52.25%	40.04%	+12.21%

Dividends

CLFD vs. SWKS - Dividend Comparison

CLFD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SWKS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.52%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CLFD Clearfield, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SWKS Skyworks Solutions, Inc.	3.52%	4.45%	3.11%	2.31%	2.59%	1.37%	1.23%	1.36%	2.09%	1.26%	1.45%	1.02%

Financials

CLFD vs. SWKS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Clearfield, Inc. and Skyworks Solutions, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

CLFD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Clearfield, Inc. reported a gross profit of 11.16M and revenue of 34.39M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 32.5%.

SWKS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Skyworks Solutions, Inc. reported a gross profit of 385.40M and revenue of 943.70M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.8%.

CLFD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Clearfield, Inc. reported an operating income of -2.07M and revenue of 34.39M, resulting in an operating margin of -6.0%.

SWKS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Skyworks Solutions, Inc. reported an operating income of 42.10M and revenue of 943.70M, resulting in an operating margin of 4.5%.

CLFD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Clearfield, Inc. reported a net income of -528.00K and revenue of 34.39M, resulting in a net margin of -1.5%.

SWKS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Skyworks Solutions, Inc. reported a net income of 35.60M and revenue of 943.70M, resulting in a net margin of 3.8%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CLFD and SWKS in my portfolio?

CLFD and SWKS have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CLFD or SWKS?

CLFD has higher volatility (32.67%) compared to SWKS (22.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CLFD dropped -98.62% vs SWKS's -96.12%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SWKS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.45 vs 0.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.