CLFD vs. ASTS
CLFD (Clearfield, Inc.) and ASTS (AST SpaceMobile, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Communication Equipment industry within the Technology sector. Over the past 5 years, CLFD returned 0.29%/yr vs 49.71%/yr for ASTS. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CLFD vs. ASTS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CLFD achieves a 27.48% return, which is significantly higher than ASTS's 0.33% return.
CLFD
- 1D
- -7.12%
- 1M
- -15.02%
- YTD
- 27.48%
- 6M
- 25.41%
- 1Y
- -10.84%
- 3Y*
- -6.77%
- 5Y*
- 0.29%
- 10Y*
- 7.66%
ASTS
- 1D
- -0.44%
- 1M
- -31.16%
- YTD
- 0.33%
- 6M
- -14.94%
- 1Y
- 45.16%
- 3Y*
- 119.93%
- 5Y*
- 49.71%
- 10Y*
- —
CLFD vs. ASTS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLFD Clearfield, Inc. | 27.48% | -5.97% | 6.60% | -69.11% | 11.51% | 173.74% |
ASTS AST SpaceMobile, Inc. | 0.33% | 244.22% | 249.92% | 25.10% | -39.29% | -31.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between CLFD and ASTS is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 7, 2021 | 0.32 |
Fundamentals
CLFD:
$507.99M
ASTS:
$21.18B
CLFD:
-$0.62
ASTS:
-$1.84
CLFD:
3.77
ASTS:
227.68
CLFD:
2.09
ASTS:
7.96
CLFD:
$136.22M
ASTS:
$84.94M
CLFD:
$50.71M
ASTS:
-$22.93M
CLFD:
$11.00M
ASTS:
-$536.80M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CLFD vs. ASTS — Risk / Return Rank
CLFD
ASTS
CLFD vs. ASTS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Clearfield, Inc. (CLFD) and AST SpaceMobile, Inc. (ASTS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CLFD | ASTS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 1.15 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.26 | 0.95 | -1.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.39 | 1.80 | -2.19 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CLFD vs. ASTS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CLFD drawdown since its inception was -98.62%, which is greater than ASTS's maximum drawdown of -85.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLFD and ASTS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CLFD | ASTS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.62% | -85.57% | -13.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -42.66% | -47.69% | +5.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -53.17% | -70.66% | +17.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -82.52% | -85.57% | +3.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -82.52% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -71.77% | -45.25% | -26.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -63.01% | -40.51% | -22.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 27.74% | 25.19% | +2.55% |
Volatility
CLFD vs. ASTS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Clearfield, Inc. (CLFD) is 23.51%, while AST SpaceMobile, Inc. (ASTS) has a volatility of 41.29%. This indicates that CLFD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ASTS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CLFD | ASTS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 23.51% | 41.29% | -17.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 44.59% | 83.69% | -39.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 59.50% | 105.96% | -46.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 57.05% | 109.64% | -52.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 52.48% | 110.94% | -58.46% |
Dividends
CLFD vs. ASTS - Dividend Comparison
Neither CLFD nor ASTS has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
CLFD vs. ASTS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Clearfield, Inc. and AST SpaceMobile, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
CLFD and ASTS have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ASTS has higher volatility (41.29%) compared to CLFD (23.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CLFD dropped -98.62% vs ASTS's -85.57%.
ASTS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.43 vs -0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CLFD and ASTS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer