CLDL vs. OOQB

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CLDL (Direxion Daily Cloud Computing Bull 2X Shares) and OOQB (Volatility Shares One+One Nasdaq-100® and Bitcoin ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CLDL is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Direxion, while OOQB is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Volatility Shares. Both are actively managed. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CLDL charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for OOQB.

Performance

CLDL vs. OOQB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Cloud Computing Bull 2X Shares (CLDL) and Volatility Shares One+One Nasdaq-100® and Bitcoin ETF (OOQB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

CLDL

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

OOQB

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: -18.43%
• 6M: -24.99%
• 1Y: -27.35%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CLDL vs. OOQB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CLDL Direxion Daily Cloud Computing Bull 2X Shares	0.00%	-7.68%
OOQB Volatility Shares One+One Nasdaq-100® and Bitcoin ETF	-18.43%	-13.30%

Correlation

The correlation between CLDL and OOQB is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.14
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2025	0.39

Over the past year, the correlation between CLDL and OOQB has dropped to 0.14 - well below their long-term average of 0.39, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

CLDL vs. OOQB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OOQB

OOQB Risk / Return Rank: 4
OOQB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
OOQB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
OOQB Omega Ratio Rank: 4
OOQB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
OOQB Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CLDL vs. OOQB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Cloud Computing Bull 2X Shares (CLDL) and Volatility Shares One+One Nasdaq-100® and Bitcoin ETF (OOQB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CLDL	OOQB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	-0.53	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	-0.41	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	CLDL	OOQB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-53.44%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-53.44%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-43.69%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-23.26%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	30.11%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CLDL	OOQB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.00%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	39.39%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	51.57%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	58.12%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	58.12%	—

CLDL vs. OOQB - Expense Ratio Comparison

CLDL has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than OOQB's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

CLDL vs. OOQB - Dividend Comparison

CLDL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.21%, less than OOQB's 11.62% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
CLDL Direxion Daily Cloud Computing Bull 2X Shares	0.21%	0.26%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	4.78%
OOQB Volatility Shares One+One Nasdaq-100® and Bitcoin ETF	11.62%	9.53%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CLDL and OOQB in my portfolio?

CLDL and OOQB have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CLDL or OOQB?

On fees, OOQB is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CLDL or OOQB?

OOQB is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for CLDL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CLDL or OOQB?

OOQB has the higher dividend yield at 11.62%, compared with 0.21% for CLDL.

What is the main difference between CLDL and OOQB?

CLDL is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while OOQB is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Volatility Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for CLDL and 0.75% for OOQB.