CLCG vs. GARY
CLCG (Crossmark Large Cap Growth ETF) and GARY (Mango Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CLCG charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.77%/yr for GARY.
Performance
CLCG vs. GARY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CLCG achieves a 5.84% return, which is significantly lower than GARY's 29.46% return.
CLCG
- 1D
- -1.57%
- 1M
- -1.49%
- 6M
- 6.74%
- YTD
- 5.84%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GARY
- 1D
- -1.27%
- 1M
- -0.99%
- 6M
- 21.92%
- YTD
- 29.46%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CLCG vs. GARY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CLCG Crossmark Large Cap Growth ETF | 5.84% | -0.11% |
GARY Mango Growth ETF | 29.46% | 0.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between CLCG and GARY is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 2025 | 0.82 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CLCG vs. GARY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Crossmark Large Cap Growth ETF (CLCG) and Mango Growth ETF (GARY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CLCG vs. GARY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CLCG drawdown since its inception was -16.32%, which is greater than GARY's maximum drawdown of -10.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLCG and GARY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CLCG | GARY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.32% | -10.28% | -6.04% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.09% | -5.64% | +1.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.83% | -1.93% | -1.90% |
Volatility
CLCG vs. GARY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CLCG | GARY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.71% | 21.74% | -4.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.71% | 21.74% | -4.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.71% | 21.74% | -4.03% |
CLCG vs. GARY - Expense Ratio Comparison
CLCG has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than GARY's 0.77% expense ratio.
Dividends
CLCG vs. GARY - Dividend Comparison
CLCG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%, more than GARY's 0.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
CLCG Crossmark Large Cap Growth ETF | 0.06% | 0.07% |
GARY Mango Growth ETF | 0.04% | 0.05% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CLCG and GARY have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CLCG is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CLCG is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.77% for GARY.
CLCG has the higher dividend yield at 0.06%, compared with 0.04% for GARY.
They also come from different issuers: Crossmark and Mango. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for CLCG and 0.77% for GARY.
Find the right allocation for CLCG and GARY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer