CL vs. MRK
CL (Colgate-Palmolive Company) and MRK (Merck & Co., Inc.) are both stocks. CL operates in Household & Personal Products (Consumer Defensive), while MRK operates in Drug Manufacturers - General (Healthcare). Over the past 10 years, CL returned 4.62%/yr vs 11.59%/yr for MRK. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CL vs. MRK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with CL having a 14.60% return and MRK slightly lower at 13.94%. Over the past 10 years, CL has underperformed MRK with an annualized return of 4.62%, while MRK has yielded a comparatively higher 11.59% annualized return.
CL
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 1.80%
- YTD
- 14.60%
- 6M
- 15.59%
- 1Y
- -1.53%
- 3Y*
- 8.47%
- 5Y*
- 3.79%
- 10Y*
- 4.62%
MRK
- 1D
- -1.42%
- 1M
- 4.94%
- YTD
- 13.94%
- 6M
- 20.60%
- 1Y
- 50.79%
- 3Y*
- 5.87%
- 5Y*
- 12.81%
- 10Y*
- 11.59%
CL vs. MRK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CL Colgate-Palmolive Company | 14.60% | -10.98% | 16.57% | 3.78% | -5.44% | 2.08% | 27.17% | 18.60% | -19.19% | 17.88% |
MRK Merck & Co., Inc. | 13.94% | 9.79% | -6.26% | 1.01% | 49.42% | 1.75% | -7.20% | 22.27% | 39.95% | -1.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between CL and MRK is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 1978 | 0.34 |
Fundamentals
CL:
$72.02B
MRK:
$294.29B
CL:
$2.58
MRK:
$3.58
CL:
34.68
MRK:
33.21
CL:
8.96
MRK:
0.03
CL:
3.48
MRK:
4.52
CL:
496.66
MRK:
6.41
CL:
$20.80B
MRK:
$65.59B
CL:
$12.49B
MRK:
$49.79B
CL:
$3.92B
MRK:
$22.69B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CL vs. MRK — Risk / Return Rank
CL
MRK
CL vs. MRK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL) and Merck & Co., Inc. (MRK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CL | MRK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.95 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.74 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.33 | -0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.08 | 4.49 | -4.57 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.14 | 11.22 | -11.35 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CL vs. MRK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CL drawdown since its inception was -58.91%, smaller than the maximum MRK drawdown of -68.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CL and MRK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CL | MRK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.91% | -68.61% | +9.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.64% | -11.37% | -7.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.05% | -43.44% | +14.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.05% | -43.44% | +14.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.05% | -43.44% | +14.39% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.31% | -5.03% | -9.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.24% | -18.83% | +7.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.35% | 4.54% | +6.81% |
Volatility
CL vs. MRK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL) is 8.32%, while Merck & Co., Inc. (MRK) has a volatility of 9.57%. This indicates that CL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MRK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CL | MRK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.32% | 9.57% | -1.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.28% | 18.04% | -0.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.83% | 27.18% | -5.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.81% | 23.66% | -4.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.75% | 22.96% | -3.21% |
Dividends
CL vs. MRK - Dividend Comparison
CL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.34%, less than MRK's 2.79% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CL Colgate-Palmolive Company | 2.34% | 2.61% | 2.18% | 2.40% | 2.36% | 2.10% | 2.05% | 2.48% | 2.79% | 2.11% | 2.37% | 2.25% |
MRK Merck & Co., Inc. | 2.79% | 3.12% | 3.14% | 2.72% | 2.52% | 3.41% | 3.03% | 2.48% | 2.60% | 3.36% | 3.14% | 3.43% |
Financials
CL vs. MRK - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Colgate-Palmolive Company and Merck & Co., Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CL vs. MRK - Profitability Comparison
CL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Colgate-Palmolive Company reported a gross profit of 3.23B and revenue of 5.32B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 60.6%.
MRK - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Merck & Co., Inc. reported a gross profit of 13.34B and revenue of 16.29B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 81.9%.
CL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Colgate-Palmolive Company reported an operating income of 1.16B and revenue of 5.32B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.7%.
MRK - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Merck & Co., Inc. reported an operating income of -1.88B and revenue of 16.29B, resulting in an operating margin of -11.6%.
CL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Colgate-Palmolive Company reported a net income of 646.00M and revenue of 5.32B, resulting in a net margin of 12.1%.
MRK - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Merck & Co., Inc. reported a net income of -4.24B and revenue of 16.29B, resulting in a net margin of -26.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CL and MRK have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MRK has higher volatility (9.57%) compared to CL (8.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CL dropped -58.91% vs MRK's -68.61%.
MRK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs -0.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CL and MRK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer