PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CJT.TO vs. QQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CJT.TO vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Cargojet Inc. (CJT.TO) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

CJT.TO is traded in CAD, while QQQ is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the QQQ values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CJT.TO achieves a -2.38% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 22.37% return. Over the past 10 years, CJT.TO has underperformed QQQ with an annualized return of 11.24%, while QQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 22.95% annualized return.


CJT.TO

1D
-1.21%
1M
-0.66%
YTD
-2.38%
6M
2.60%
1Y
-12.00%
3Y*
-5.89%
5Y*
-13.08%
10Y*
11.24%

QQQ

1D
0.00%
1M
8.61%
YTD
22.37%
6M
19.53%
1Y
44.27%
3Y*
30.15%
5Y*
21.25%
10Y*
22.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CJT.TO vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CJT.TO
Cargojet Inc.
-2.38%-20.96%-8.44%3.57%-29.54%-22.00%109.37%47.47%22.14%30.23%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
16.73%15.23%36.37%51.45%-27.77%26.27%46.11%32.13%8.34%24.22%

Correlation

The correlation between CJT.TO and QQQ is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.31

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2009

0.24

The correlation between CJT.TO and QQQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (all time) to 0.37 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CJT.TO vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CJT.TO
CJT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
CJT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CJT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
CJT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
CJT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
CJT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQ
QQQ Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
QQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CJT.TO vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cargojet Inc. (CJT.TO) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CJT.TOQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.98

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.96

1.51

-0.54

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.32

3.62

-3.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.63

11.55

-12.18

CJT.TO vs. QQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CJT.TO Sharpe Ratio is -0.35, which is lower than the QQQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CJT.TO and QQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CJT.TOQQQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.35

2.85

-3.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.35

1.03

-1.38

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

1.11

-0.79

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

1.19

-0.84

Drawdowns

CJT.TO vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CJT.TO drawdown since its inception was -85.62%, which is greater than QQQ's maximum drawdown of -31.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CJT.TO and QQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CJT.TOQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-85.62%

-31.80%

-53.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-37.77%

-12.29%

-25.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-50.87%

-22.58%

-28.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-66.58%

-31.80%

-34.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-71.09%

-31.80%

-39.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-64.80%

-0.38%

-64.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.49%

-4.72%

-23.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.19%

3.84%

+15.35%

Volatility

CJT.TO vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison

Cargojet Inc. (CJT.TO) has a higher volatility of 6.64% compared to Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) at 4.03%. This indicates that CJT.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CJT.TOQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.64%

4.03%

+2.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.66%

11.81%

+10.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

34.03%

15.61%

+18.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.16%

20.70%

+16.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.78%

20.82%

+14.96%

Dividends

CJT.TO vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison

CJT.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.76%, more than QQQ's 0.40% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CJT.TO
Cargojet Inc.
1.76%1.67%1.23%0.98%0.96%0.62%0.44%0.91%1.20%1.31%1.42%2.31%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
0.40%0.45%0.56%0.62%0.80%0.43%0.55%0.74%0.91%0.84%1.06%0.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


CJT.TO and QQQ have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CJT.TO and QQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer