CJP.NEO vs. DBJP
CJP.NEO (iShares Japan Fundamental Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)) and DBJP (Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF) are both Japan Equities funds - CJP.NEO tracks the FTSE RAFI Japan Canadian Dollar Hedged Index while DBJP tracks the MSCI Japan US Dollar Hedged Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CJP.NEO returned 16.15%/yr vs 17.38%/yr for DBJP. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CJP.NEO charges 0.71%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for DBJP.
Performance
CJP.NEO vs. DBJP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
CJP.NEO is traded in CAD, while DBJP is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the DBJP values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CJP.NEO achieves a 19.29% return, which is significantly lower than DBJP's 22.04% return. Over the past 10 years, CJP.NEO has underperformed DBJP with an annualized return of 16.15%, while DBJP has yielded a comparatively higher 17.38% annualized return.
CJP.NEO
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- 9.32%
- YTD
- 19.29%
- 6M
- 23.23%
- 1Y
- 51.21%
- 3Y*
- 30.24%
- 5Y*
- 22.91%
- 10Y*
- 16.15%
DBJP
- 1D
- 1.22%
- 1M
- 11.05%
- YTD
- 22.04%
- 6M
- 23.54%
- 1Y
- 54.63%
- 3Y*
- 30.54%
- 5Y*
- 24.91%
- 10Y*
- 17.38%
CJP.NEO vs. DBJP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CJP.NEO iShares Japan Fundamental Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) | 19.29% | 30.67% | 26.74% | 35.03% | 3.67% | 18.19% | 0.18% | 13.12% | -17.35% | 21.33% |
DBJP Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF | 22.04% | 23.57% | 36.31% | 33.21% | 2.64% | 12.02% | 8.67% | 14.93% | -7.60% | 13.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between CJP.NEO and DBJP is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 10, 2011 | 0.69 |
The correlation between CJP.NEO and DBJP shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (all time) to 0.83 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CJP.NEO vs. DBJP — Risk / Return Rank
CJP.NEO
DBJP
CJP.NEO vs. DBJP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Japan Fundamental Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (CJP.NEO) and Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF (DBJP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CJP.NEO | DBJP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.53 | 1.52 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.68 | 5.44 | -0.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.78 | 21.03 | -3.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CJP.NEO | DBJP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.89 | 2.91 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.26 | 1.38 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.83 | 0.94 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.83 | -0.38 |
Drawdowns
CJP.NEO vs. DBJP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CJP.NEO drawdown since its inception was -38.36%, which is greater than DBJP's maximum drawdown of -29.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CJP.NEO and DBJP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CJP.NEO | DBJP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.36% | -29.25% | -9.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.99% | -10.09% | -0.90% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.86% | -20.32% | -0.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.86% | -20.32% | -0.54% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.75% | -27.52% | -10.23% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.17% | -6.25% | -4.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.90% | 2.61% | +0.29% |
Volatility
CJP.NEO vs. DBJP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Japan Fundamental Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (CJP.NEO) is 3.09%, while Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF (DBJP) has a volatility of 3.89%. This indicates that CJP.NEO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBJP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CJP.NEO | DBJP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.09% | 3.89% | -0.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.95% | 13.89% | -0.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.80% | 18.85% | -1.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.27% | 18.20% | +0.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.61% | 18.63% | +0.98% |
CJP.NEO vs. DBJP - Expense Ratio Comparison
CJP.NEO has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is higher than DBJP's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
CJP.NEO vs. DBJP - Dividend Comparison
CJP.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.24%, less than DBJP's 2.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CJP.NEO iShares Japan Fundamental Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) | 1.24% | 1.48% | 1.71% | 1.24% | 1.96% | 1.56% | 1.97% | 2.42% | 2.38% | 1.48% | 0.97% | 0.84% |
DBJP Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF | 2.34% | 2.81% | 2.80% | 5.21% | 0.80% | 2.30% | 2.53% | 2.56% | 3.87% | 2.07% | 1.13% | 5.95% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CJP.NEO and DBJP have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DBJP is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DBJP is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.71% for CJP.NEO.
CJP.NEO tracks FTSE RAFI Japan Canadian Dollar Hedged Index, while DBJP tracks MSCI Japan US Dollar Hedged Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.71% for CJP.NEO and 0.45% for DBJP.
Find the right allocation for CJP.NEO and DBJP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer