CJP.NEO vs. EWJ
CJP.NEO (iShares Japan Fundamental Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)) and EWJ (iShares MSCI Japan ETF) are both Japan Equities funds from iShares - CJP.NEO tracks the FTSE RAFI Japan Canadian Dollar Hedged Index while EWJ tracks the MSCI Japan Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CJP.NEO returned 16.15%/yr vs 10.16%/yr for EWJ. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CJP.NEO charges 0.71%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for EWJ.
Performance
CJP.NEO vs. EWJ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
CJP.NEO is traded in CAD, while EWJ is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the EWJ values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CJP.NEO achieves a 19.29% return, which is significantly higher than EWJ's 17.83% return. Over the past 10 years, CJP.NEO has outperformed EWJ with an annualized return of 16.15%, while EWJ has yielded a comparatively lower 10.16% annualized return.
CJP.NEO
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- 9.32%
- YTD
- 19.29%
- 6M
- 23.23%
- 1Y
- 51.21%
- 3Y*
- 30.24%
- 5Y*
- 22.91%
- 10Y*
- 16.15%
EWJ
- 1D
- 0.80%
- 1M
- 8.73%
- YTD
- 17.83%
- 6M
- 17.51%
- 1Y
- 34.24%
- 3Y*
- 19.67%
- 5Y*
- 11.90%
- 10Y*
- 10.16%
CJP.NEO vs. EWJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CJP.NEO iShares Japan Fundamental Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) | 19.29% | 30.67% | 26.74% | 35.03% | 3.67% | 18.19% | 0.18% | 13.12% | -17.35% | 21.33% |
EWJ iShares MSCI Japan ETF | 17.83% | 20.07% | 16.23% | 17.64% | -11.86% | 0.24% | 13.45% | 13.47% | -6.81% | 16.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between CJP.NEO and EWJ is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2009 | 0.63 |
The correlation between CJP.NEO and EWJ shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (all time) to 0.75 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CJP.NEO vs. EWJ — Risk / Return Rank
CJP.NEO
EWJ
CJP.NEO vs. EWJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Japan Fundamental Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (CJP.NEO) and iShares MSCI Japan ETF (EWJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CJP.NEO | EWJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.53 | 1.34 | +0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.68 | 2.68 | +2.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.78 | 9.39 | +8.39 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CJP.NEO | EWJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.89 | 1.83 | +1.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.26 | 0.73 | +0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.83 | 0.65 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.54 | -0.10 |
Drawdowns
CJP.NEO vs. EWJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CJP.NEO drawdown since its inception was -38.36%, which is greater than EWJ's maximum drawdown of -27.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CJP.NEO and EWJ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CJP.NEO | EWJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.36% | -27.27% | -11.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.99% | -12.81% | +1.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.86% | -14.94% | -5.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.86% | -27.27% | +6.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.75% | -27.27% | -10.48% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.17% | -7.01% | -4.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.90% | 3.66% | -0.76% |
Volatility
CJP.NEO vs. EWJ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Japan Fundamental Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (CJP.NEO) is 3.09%, while iShares MSCI Japan ETF (EWJ) has a volatility of 4.35%. This indicates that CJP.NEO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EWJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CJP.NEO | EWJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.09% | 4.35% | -1.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.95% | 14.56% | -1.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.80% | 18.83% | -1.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.27% | 16.35% | +1.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.61% | 15.58% | +4.03% |
CJP.NEO vs. EWJ - Expense Ratio Comparison
CJP.NEO has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is higher than EWJ's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
CJP.NEO vs. EWJ - Dividend Comparison
CJP.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.24%, less than EWJ's 3.89% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CJP.NEO iShares Japan Fundamental Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) | 1.24% | 1.48% | 1.71% | 1.24% | 1.96% | 1.56% | 1.97% | 2.42% | 2.38% | 1.48% | 0.97% | 0.84% |
EWJ iShares MSCI Japan ETF | 3.89% | 4.52% | 2.34% | 2.03% | 1.23% | 2.08% | 1.04% | 2.03% | 1.71% | 1.25% | 1.95% | 1.27% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CJP.NEO and EWJ have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EWJ is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EWJ is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.71% for CJP.NEO.
CJP.NEO tracks FTSE RAFI Japan Canadian Dollar Hedged Index, while EWJ tracks MSCI Japan Index. Their fees differ too: 0.71% for CJP.NEO and 0.49% for EWJ.
Find the right allocation for CJP.NEO and EWJ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer