CINF vs. GPIQ

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CINF (Cincinnati Financial Corporation) is a stock, while GPIQ (Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF) is Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Goldman Sachs. Over the past year, CINF returned 6.69% vs 37.50% for GPIQ. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

CINF vs. GPIQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cincinnati Financial Corporation (CINF) and Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CINF achieves a -2.68% return, which is significantly lower than GPIQ's 18.30% return.

CINF

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: -0.97%
• YTD: -2.68%
• 6M: -1.87%
• 1Y: 6.69%
• 3Y*: 19.23%
• 5Y*: 7.56%
• 10Y*: 11.49%

GPIQ

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: 8.51%
• YTD: 18.30%
• 6M: 17.64%
• 1Y: 37.50%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CINF vs. GPIQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
CINF Cincinnati Financial Corporation	-2.68%	16.27%	42.48%	4.56%
GPIQ Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF	18.30%	19.77%	23.22%	15.38%

Correlation

The correlation between CINF and GPIQ is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.06
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2023	0.12

Return for Risk

CINF vs. GPIQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CINF

CINF Risk / Return Rank: 50
CINF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
CINF Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
CINF Omega Ratio Rank: 43
CINF Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
CINF Martin Ratio Rank: 57

GPIQ

GPIQ Risk / Return Rank: 81
GPIQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
GPIQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
GPIQ Omega Ratio Rank: 82
GPIQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
GPIQ Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CINF vs. GPIQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cincinnati Financial Corporation (CINF) and Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CINF	GPIQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.35	2.81	-2.47
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.61	3.71	-3.10
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.07	1.51	-0.43
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.64	3.96	-3.32
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.66	17.48	-15.82
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CINF vs. GPIQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CINF Sharpe Ratio is 0.35, which is lower than the GPIQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CINF and GPIQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CINF	GPIQ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.35	2.81	-2.47
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.30	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.40	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.42	1.78	-1.37

Drawdowns

CINF vs. GPIQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CINF drawdown since its inception was -59.64%, which is greater than GPIQ's maximum drawdown of -21.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CINF and GPIQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	CINF	GPIQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-59.64%	-21.06%	-38.58%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.46%	-9.51%	-0.95%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.03%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.77%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-58.12%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.94%	-0.19%	-7.75%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.20%	-2.27%	-9.93%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.05%	2.15%	+1.90%

Volatility

CINF vs. GPIQ - Volatility Comparison

Cincinnati Financial Corporation (CINF) has a higher volatility of 4.44% compared to Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIQ) at 3.39%. This indicates that CINF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GPIQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CINF	GPIQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.44%	3.39%	+1.05%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.21%	10.44%	+2.77%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.42%	13.40%	+6.02%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.65%	17.47%	+8.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	28.79%	17.47%	+11.32%

Dividends

CINF vs. GPIQ - Dividend Comparison

CINF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.25%, less than GPIQ's 9.32% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CINF Cincinnati Financial Corporation	2.25%	2.13%	2.25%	2.90%	2.70%	2.21%	2.75%	2.13%	2.74%	3.33%	2.53%	3.89%
GPIQ Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF	9.32%	9.81%	9.18%	1.74%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CINF and GPIQ in my portfolio?

CINF and GPIQ have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CINF or GPIQ?

CINF has higher volatility (4.44%) compared to GPIQ (3.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CINF dropped -59.64% vs GPIQ's -21.06%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GPIQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.81 vs 0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.