CIMDX vs. HWMIX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CIMDX (Clarkston Founders Fund) and HWMIX (Hotchkis & Wiley Mid-Cap Value Fund) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, CIMDX returned 0.69%/yr vs 9.81%/yr for HWMIX. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CIMDX charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for HWMIX.

Performance

CIMDX vs. HWMIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Clarkston Founders Fund (CIMDX) and Hotchkis & Wiley Mid-Cap Value Fund (HWMIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CIMDX achieves a -4.16% return, which is significantly lower than HWMIX's 15.50% return.

CIMDX

• 1D: -1.36%
• 1M: -0.62%
• YTD: -4.16%
• 6M: -3.24%
• 1Y: 2.76%
• 3Y*: 5.76%
• 5Y*: 0.69%
• 10Y*: —

HWMIX

• 1D: 0.22%
• 1M: 1.83%
• YTD: 15.50%
• 6M: 15.92%
• 1Y: 32.30%
• 3Y*: 15.32%
• 5Y*: 9.81%
• 10Y*: 9.76%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CIMDX vs. HWMIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CIMDX Clarkston Founders Fund	-4.16%	7.35%	5.67%	10.38%	-3.67%	6.23%	23.21%	23.74%	-7.85%	11.25%
HWMIX Hotchkis & Wiley Mid-Cap Value Fund	15.50%	7.87%	3.62%	19.87%	1.63%	39.18%	0.49%	12.97%	-19.32%	6.75%

Correlation

The correlation between CIMDX and HWMIX is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.70
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.72
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.77
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2017	0.77

The correlation between CIMDX and HWMIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

CIMDX vs. HWMIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CIMDX

CIMDX Risk / Return Rank: 4
CIMDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
CIMDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
CIMDX Omega Ratio Rank: 4
CIMDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
CIMDX Martin Ratio Rank: 4

HWMIX

HWMIX Risk / Return Rank: 64
HWMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
HWMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
HWMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 50
HWMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
HWMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CIMDX vs. HWMIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Clarkston Founders Fund (CIMDX) and Hotchkis & Wiley Mid-Cap Value Fund (HWMIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CIMDX	HWMIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.20	2.15	-1.96
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.41	3.05	-2.64
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.05	1.39	-0.34
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.28	4.89	-4.61
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.70	13.73	-13.03
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CIMDX vs. HWMIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CIMDX Sharpe Ratio is 0.20, which is lower than the HWMIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CIMDX and HWMIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CIMDX	HWMIX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.20	2.15	-1.96
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.04	0.44	-0.40
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.38	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.41	0.48	-0.07

Drawdowns

CIMDX vs. HWMIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CIMDX drawdown since its inception was -31.86%, smaller than the maximum HWMIX drawdown of -69.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIMDX and HWMIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	CIMDX	HWMIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.86%	-69.84%	+37.98%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.30%	-7.16%	-4.14%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.82%	-25.90%	+11.08%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.40%	-25.90%	+5.50%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-63.21%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.77%	0.00%	-7.77%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.91%	-10.83%	+4.92%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.51%	2.54%	+1.97%

Volatility

CIMDX vs. HWMIX - Volatility Comparison

Clarkston Founders Fund (CIMDX) has a higher volatility of 4.82% compared to Hotchkis & Wiley Mid-Cap Value Fund (HWMIX) at 3.49%. This indicates that CIMDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HWMIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CIMDX	HWMIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.82%	3.49%	+1.33%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.09%	10.80%	+1.29%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.98%	16.25%	-0.27%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.99%	22.19%	-6.20%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.51%	25.56%	-8.05%

CIMDX vs. HWMIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CIMDX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than HWMIX's 1.01% expense ratio.

Dividends

CIMDX vs. HWMIX - Dividend Comparison

CIMDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.38%, more than HWMIX's 1.21% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CIMDX Clarkston Founders Fund	3.38%	3.24%	0.45%	1.62%	6.38%	0.44%	0.91%	3.32%	2.27%	0.41%	0.00%	0.00%
HWMIX Hotchkis & Wiley Mid-Cap Value Fund	1.21%	1.39%	1.15%	0.28%	0.49%	1.28%	2.25%	1.60%	2.99%	6.72%	1.53%	14.67%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CIMDX and HWMIX in my portfolio?

CIMDX and HWMIX have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CIMDX or HWMIX?

CIMDX has higher volatility (4.82%) compared to HWMIX (3.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CIMDX dropped -31.86% vs HWMIX's -69.84%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

HWMIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.