CII vs. FASGX
Compare and contrast key facts about BlackRock Enhanced Large Cap Core Fund (CII) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX).
CII is an actively managed fund by BlackRock. It was launched on Apr 27, 2004. FASGX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Dec 30, 1991.
Performance
CII vs. FASGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CII vs. FASGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CII BlackRock Enhanced Large Cap Core Fund | -8.35% | 37.78% | 12.70% | 18.47% | -13.21% | 34.26% | 8.11% | 30.46% | -8.60% | 27.73% |
FASGX Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund | -2.99% | 18.23% | 10.81% | 16.45% | -16.83% | 13.98% | 17.19% | 22.81% | -7.65% | 17.34% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CII achieves a -8.35% return, which is significantly lower than FASGX's -2.99% return. Over the past 10 years, CII has outperformed FASGX with an annualized return of 13.13%, while FASGX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.70% annualized return.
CII
- 1D
- 2.24%
- 1M
- -6.83%
- YTD
- -8.35%
- 6M
- 3.68%
- 1Y
- 34.51%
- 3Y*
- 16.55%
- 5Y*
- 11.62%
- 10Y*
- 13.13%
FASGX
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- -7.42%
- YTD
- -2.99%
- 6M
- -0.12%
- 1Y
- 15.54%
- 3Y*
- 11.72%
- 5Y*
- 6.38%
- 10Y*
- 8.70%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CII vs. FASGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CII has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is higher than FASGX's 0.67% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CII vs. FASGX — Risk / Return Rank
CII
FASGX
CII vs. FASGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Enhanced Large Cap Core Fund (CII) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CII | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.73 | 1.21 | +0.52 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.41 | 1.73 | +0.68 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.26 | +0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.92 | 1.55 | +1.37 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.81 | 6.89 | +3.93 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CII | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.73 | 1.21 | +0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 | 0.53 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.71 | 0.70 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 0.60 | -0.11 |
Correlation
The correlation between CII and FASGX is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
CII vs. FASGX - Dividend Comparison
CII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.51%, more than FASGX's 7.56% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CII BlackRock Enhanced Large Cap Core Fund | 18.51% | 16.65% | 6.15% | 6.28% | 12.27% | 4.98% | 6.03% | 5.79% | 7.06% | 6.07% | 8.38% | 8.49% |
FASGX Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund | 7.56% | 7.33% | 4.60% | 1.72% | 6.69% | 2.73% | 2.20% | 5.19% | 6.31% | 2.75% | 0.20% | 5.58% |
Drawdowns
CII vs. FASGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CII drawdown since its inception was -56.43%, which is greater than FASGX's maximum drawdown of -47.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CII and FASGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CII | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.43% | -47.35% | -9.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.76% | -9.07% | -2.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.32% | -23.54% | +1.22% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.56% | -27.20% | -13.36% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.51% | -7.95% | -1.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.21% | -6.74% | +0.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.18% | 2.04% | +1.14% |
Volatility
CII vs. FASGX - Volatility Comparison
BlackRock Enhanced Large Cap Core Fund (CII) has a higher volatility of 7.33% compared to Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX) at 4.57%. This indicates that CII's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FASGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CII | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.33% | 4.57% | +2.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.67% | 7.78% | +4.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.00% | 12.82% | +7.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.99% | 12.14% | +4.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.45% | 12.56% | +5.89% |