PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CIGEX vs. VGPMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CIGEX vs. VGPMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calamos Global Equity Fund (CIGEX) and Vanguard Global Capital Cycles Fund (VGPMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CIGEX achieves a 21.47% return, which is significantly higher than VGPMX's 19.46% return. Over the past 10 years, CIGEX has outperformed VGPMX with an annualized return of 15.62%, while VGPMX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.37% annualized return.


CIGEX

1D
-1.00%
1M
6.54%
YTD
21.47%
6M
21.44%
1Y
35.39%
3Y*
27.32%
5Y*
12.34%
10Y*
15.62%

VGPMX

1D
-1.39%
1M
4.56%
YTD
19.46%
6M
24.26%
1Y
63.99%
3Y*
30.93%
5Y*
19.98%
10Y*
11.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CIGEX vs. VGPMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CIGEX
Calamos Global Equity Fund
21.47%18.46%30.61%24.55%-27.42%16.61%44.24%29.43%-15.54%34.56%
VGPMX
Vanguard Global Capital Cycles Fund
19.46%65.96%5.78%10.06%7.34%19.50%17.21%20.67%-32.26%13.75%

Correlation

The correlation between CIGEX and VGPMX is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 5, 2007

0.63

The correlation between CIGEX and VGPMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CIGEX vs. VGPMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CIGEX
CIGEX Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
CIGEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CIGEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
CIGEX Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
CIGEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
CIGEX Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

VGPMX
VGPMX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
VGPMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGPMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGPMX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
VGPMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGPMX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CIGEX vs. VGPMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Global Equity Fund (CIGEX) and Vanguard Global Capital Cycles Fund (VGPMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CIGEXVGPMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.99

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.66

-0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.69

5.07

-2.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.39

21.13

-10.74

CIGEX vs. VGPMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CIGEX Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is lower than the VGPMX Sharpe Ratio of 3.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CIGEX and VGPMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CIGEXVGPMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.88

3.86

-1.99

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

1.16

-0.52

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

0.55

+0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

0.26

+0.25

Drawdowns

CIGEX vs. VGPMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CIGEX drawdown since its inception was -60.48%, smaller than the maximum VGPMX drawdown of -78.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIGEX and VGPMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CIGEXVGPMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.48%

-78.85%

+18.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.31%

-12.80%

-0.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.41%

-14.63%

-5.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.81%

-22.71%

-13.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.81%

-54.59%

+18.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.00%

-1.39%

+0.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.34%

-34.55%

+24.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.44%

3.06%

+0.38%

Volatility

CIGEX vs. VGPMX - Volatility Comparison

Calamos Global Equity Fund (CIGEX) and Vanguard Global Capital Cycles Fund (VGPMX) have volatilities of 6.41% and 6.17%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CIGEXVGPMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.41%

6.17%

+0.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.57%

13.92%

+1.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.11%

16.79%

+2.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.43%

17.39%

+2.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.45%

20.87%

-1.42%

CIGEX vs. VGPMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CIGEX has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than VGPMX's 0.36% expense ratio.


Dividends

CIGEX vs. VGPMX - Dividend Comparison

CIGEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.65%, more than VGPMX's 3.27% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CIGEX
Calamos Global Equity Fund
12.65%15.37%8.67%0.10%4.43%11.75%6.51%7.44%27.66%9.21%4.62%1.98%
VGPMX
Vanguard Global Capital Cycles Fund
3.27%2.59%2.68%3.22%3.27%3.26%2.03%2.39%3.02%0.02%1.72%2.32%

Frequently Asked Questions


CIGEX and VGPMX have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CIGEX has higher volatility (6.41%) compared to VGPMX (6.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CIGEX dropped -60.48% vs VGPMX's -78.85%.

VGPMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.86 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CIGEX and VGPMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer