PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CIGEX vs. NFJEX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CIGEX vs. NFJEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calamos Global Equity Fund (CIGEX) and Virtus NFJ Dividend Value Fund (NFJEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CIGEX achieves a 21.64% return, which is significantly higher than NFJEX's 19.09% return. Over the past 10 years, CIGEX has outperformed NFJEX with an annualized return of 15.84%, while NFJEX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.91% annualized return.


CIGEX

1D
2.29%
1M
2.05%
YTD
21.64%
6M
20.90%
1Y
36.09%
3Y*
26.28%
5Y*
12.95%
10Y*
15.84%

NFJEX

1D
0.27%
1M
3.29%
YTD
19.09%
6M
17.57%
1Y
31.57%
3Y*
15.11%
5Y*
10.09%
10Y*
9.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CIGEX vs. NFJEX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CIGEX
Calamos Global Equity Fund
21.64%18.46%30.61%24.55%-27.42%16.61%44.24%29.43%-15.54%34.56%
NFJEX
Virtus NFJ Dividend Value Fund
19.09%8.46%5.29%19.79%-13.63%28.90%-2.13%25.12%-10.15%15.49%

Correlation

The correlation between CIGEX and NFJEX is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 2, 2007

0.78

Over the past year, the correlation between CIGEX and NFJEX has dropped to 0.56 - well below their long-term average of 0.78, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CIGEX vs. NFJEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CIGEX
CIGEX Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
CIGEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CIGEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
CIGEX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
CIGEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
CIGEX Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

NFJEX
NFJEX Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
NFJEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NFJEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
NFJEX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
NFJEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
NFJEX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CIGEX vs. NFJEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Global Equity Fund (CIGEX) and Virtus NFJ Dividend Value Fund (NFJEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CIGEXNFJEXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.42

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.65

4.30

-1.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.88

14.68

-4.80

CIGEX vs. NFJEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CIGEX Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is comparable to the NFJEX Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CIGEX and NFJEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CIGEX vs. NFJEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CIGEX drawdown since its inception was -60.48%, roughly equal to the maximum NFJEX drawdown of -61.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIGEX and NFJEX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CIGEXNFJEXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.48%

-61.94%

+1.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.31%

-7.38%

-5.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.41%

-19.69%

-0.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.81%

-23.29%

-12.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.81%

-39.25%

+3.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.86%

-0.65%

-0.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.32%

-9.60%

-0.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.56%

2.16%

+1.40%

Volatility

CIGEX vs. NFJEX - Volatility Comparison

Calamos Global Equity Fund (CIGEX) has a higher volatility of 8.04% compared to Virtus NFJ Dividend Value Fund (NFJEX) at 4.49%. This indicates that CIGEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NFJEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CIGEXNFJEXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.04%

4.49%

+3.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.94%

9.83%

+7.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.32%

13.28%

+7.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.67%

16.56%

+3.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.56%

18.16%

+1.40%

CIGEX vs. NFJEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CIGEX has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than NFJEX's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

CIGEX vs. NFJEX - Dividend Comparison

CIGEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.63%, more than NFJEX's 10.34% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CIGEX
Calamos Global Equity Fund
12.63%15.37%8.67%0.10%4.43%11.75%6.51%7.44%27.66%9.21%4.62%1.98%
NFJEX
Virtus NFJ Dividend Value Fund
10.34%12.61%3.51%14.16%19.01%6.43%1.96%14.20%27.33%27.35%6.05%2.77%

Frequently Asked Questions


CIGEX and NFJEX have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CIGEX has higher volatility (8.04%) compared to NFJEX (4.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CIGEX dropped -60.48% vs NFJEX's -61.94%.

NFJEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CIGEX and NFJEX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer