CIFU vs. NBIG
CIFU (T-REX 2X Long CIFR Daily Target ETF) and NBIG (Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CIFU charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for NBIG.
Performance
CIFU vs. NBIG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CIFU achieves a 90.91% return, which is significantly lower than NBIG's 453.13% return.
CIFU
- 1D
- 0.89%
- 1M
- 94.18%
- YTD
- 90.91%
- 6M
- 10.06%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NBIG
- 1D
- -6.73%
- 1M
- 83.04%
- YTD
- 453.13%
- 6M
- 273.38%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CIFU vs. NBIG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CIFU T-REX 2X Long CIFR Daily Target ETF | 90.91% | -6.67% |
NBIG Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF | 453.13% | -7.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between CIFU and NBIG is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2025 | 0.62 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CIFU vs. NBIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long CIFR Daily Target ETF (CIFU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF (NBIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CIFU | NBIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.99 | 1.21 | -0.22 |
Drawdowns
CIFU vs. NBIG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CIFU drawdown since its inception was -77.20%, roughly equal to the maximum NBIG drawdown of -75.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIFU and NBIG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CIFU | NBIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.20% | -75.83% | -1.37% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.09% | -9.57% | +0.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -45.35% | -43.08% | -2.27% |
Volatility
CIFU vs. NBIG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CIFU | NBIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 206.19% | 201.21% | +4.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 206.19% | 201.21% | +4.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 206.19% | 201.21% | +4.98% |
CIFU vs. NBIG - Expense Ratio Comparison
CIFU has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than NBIG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
CIFU vs. NBIG - Dividend Comparison
Neither CIFU nor NBIG has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CIFU and NBIG have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NBIG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NBIG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for CIFU.
CIFU and NBIG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: REX and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for CIFU and 0.75% for NBIG.
Find the right allocation for CIFU and NBIG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer