CIFU vs. DECO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CIFU (T-REX 2X Long CIFR Daily Target ETF) and DECO (State Street Galaxy Digital Asset Ecosystem ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CIFU is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by REX, while DECO is a Blockchain fund actively managed by State Street. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CIFU charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for DECO.

Performance

CIFU vs. DECO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-REX 2X Long CIFR Daily Target ETF (CIFU) and State Street Galaxy Digital Asset Ecosystem ETF (DECO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CIFU achieves a 90.91% return, which is significantly higher than DECO's 79.56% return.

CIFU

• 1D: 0.89%
• 1M: 94.18%
• YTD: 90.91%
• 6M: 10.06%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DECO

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: 39.50%
• YTD: 79.56%
• 6M: 62.77%
• 1Y: 167.73%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CIFU vs. DECO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CIFU T-REX 2X Long CIFR Daily Target ETF	90.91%	-6.67%
DECO State Street Galaxy Digital Asset Ecosystem ETF	79.56%	3.86%

Correlation

The correlation between CIFU and DECO is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2025	0.83

Return for Risk

CIFU vs. DECO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DECO

DECO Risk / Return Rank: 89
DECO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
DECO Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
DECO Omega Ratio Rank: 82
DECO Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
DECO Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CIFU vs. DECO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long CIFR Daily Target ETF (CIFU) and State Street Galaxy Digital Asset Ecosystem ETF (DECO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CIFU	DECO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	3.80	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.99	1.96	-0.97

Drawdowns

CIFU vs. DECO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CIFU drawdown since its inception was -77.20%, which is greater than DECO's maximum drawdown of -47.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIFU and DECO.

Drawdown Indicators

	CIFU	DECO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-77.20%	-47.71%	-29.49%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-25.60%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.09%	-0.33%	-8.76%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-45.35%	-11.67%	-33.68%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	9.14%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CIFU	DECO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	11.53%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	33.83%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	206.19%	44.46%	+161.73%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	206.19%	51.50%	+154.69%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	206.19%	51.50%	+154.69%

CIFU vs. DECO - Expense Ratio Comparison

CIFU has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than DECO's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

CIFU vs. DECO - Dividend Comparison

CIFU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DECO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.64%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
CIFU T-REX 2X Long CIFR Daily Target ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
DECO State Street Galaxy Digital Asset Ecosystem ETF	0.64%	1.16%	1.73%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CIFU and DECO in my portfolio?

CIFU and DECO have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CIFU or DECO?

On fees, DECO is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CIFU or DECO?

DECO is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for CIFU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CIFU or DECO?

DECO has the higher dividend yield at 0.64%, compared with 0.00% for CIFU.

What is the main difference between CIFU and DECO?

CIFU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while DECO is Blockchain. They also come from different issuers: REX and State Street. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for CIFU and 0.65% for DECO.