PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DECO vs. NODE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DECO vs. NODE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Galaxy Digital Asset Ecosystem ETF (DECO) and VanEck Onchain Economy ETF (NODE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DECO achieves a 61.26% return, which is significantly higher than NODE's 7.73% return.


DECO

1D
-1.75%
1M
-3.53%
6M
43.24%
YTD
61.26%
1Y
103.84%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
79.69%

NODE

1D
-2.28%
1M
-7.11%
6M
-1.11%
YTD
7.73%
1Y
25.79%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
33.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$81.73K$85.27K$116.73K
$281.15K$306.49K$518.92K

DECO vs. NODE - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between DECO and NODE is 0.94, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2025

0.93

The correlation between DECO and NODE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DECO vs. NODE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DECO
DECO Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
DECO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DECO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
DECO Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
DECO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
DECO Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

NODE
NODE Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
NODE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NODE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
NODE Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
NODE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
NODE Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DECO vs. NODE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Galaxy Digital Asset Ecosystem ETF (DECO) and VanEck Onchain Economy ETF (NODE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DECONODEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.10

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.63

0.57

+3.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.69

1.19

+8.50

DECO vs. NODE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DECO Sharpe Ratio is 1.97, which is higher than the NODE Sharpe Ratio of 0.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DECO and NODE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DECO vs. NODE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DECO drawdown since its inception was -47.71%, which is greater than NODE's maximum drawdown of -35.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DECO and NODE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DECONODEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.71%

-35.35%

-12.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.60%

-35.35%

+9.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.66%

-21.12%

+9.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.23%

-11.37%

+0.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.58%

16.88%

-7.30%

Volatility

DECO vs. NODE - Volatility Comparison

State Street Galaxy Digital Asset Ecosystem ETF (DECO) and VanEck Onchain Economy ETF (NODE) have volatilities of 19.07% and 20.06%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DECONODEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.07%

20.06%

-0.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

36.72%

38.93%

-2.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

47.28%

50.60%

-3.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

51.85%

47.18%

+4.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

51.85%

47.18%

+4.67%

DECO vs. NODE - Expense Ratio Comparison

DECO has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than NODE's 0.69% expense ratio.


Dividends

DECO vs. NODE - Dividend Comparison

DECO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.72%, less than NODE's 1.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
DECO
State Street Galaxy Digital Asset Ecosystem ETF
0.72%1.16%1.73%
NODE
VanEck Onchain Economy ETF
1.04%1.12%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, DECO and NODE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

NODE has higher volatility (20.06%) compared to DECO (19.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DECO dropped -47.71% vs NODE's -35.35%.

On 1-year performance, DECO leads with 103.84% vs 25.79% for NODE. On fees, DECO is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, DECO has been the lower-risk option at 19.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, DECO has performed better with a 103.84% return vs 25.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DECO is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for NODE.

NODE has the higher dividend yield at 1.04%, compared with 0.72% for DECO.

They also come from different issuers: State Street and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for DECO and 0.69% for NODE.

DECO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DECO and NODE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer