CIFU vs. CRMG

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

CIFU (T-REX 2X Long CIFR Daily Target ETF) and CRMG (Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.13, they often move in opposite directions. CIFU charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for CRMG.

Performance

CIFU vs. CRMG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-REX 2X Long CIFR Daily Target ETF (CIFU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF (CRMG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CIFU achieves a 78.56% return, which is significantly higher than CRMG's -56.09% return.

CIFU

• 1D: -6.47%
• 1M: 24.88%
• YTD: 78.56%
• 6M: -8.16%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CRMG

• 1D: -1.95%
• 1M: -1.95%
• YTD: -56.09%
• 6M: -50.25%
• 1Y: -60.55%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CIFU vs. CRMG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CIFU T-REX 2X Long CIFR Daily Target ETF	78.56%	-6.67%
CRMG Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF	-56.09%	33.89%

Correlation

The correlation between CIFU and CRMG is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2025	-0.13

Return for Risk

CIFU vs. CRMG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRMG

CRMG Risk / Return Rank: 2
CRMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
CRMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
CRMG Omega Ratio Rank: 3
CRMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
CRMG Martin Ratio Rank: 1

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CIFU vs. CRMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long CIFR Daily Target ETF (CIFU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF (CRMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CIFU	CRMG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	-0.81	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.81	-0.65	+1.46

Drawdowns

CIFU vs. CRMG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CIFU drawdown since its inception was -77.20%, roughly equal to the maximum CRMG drawdown of -74.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIFU and CRMG.

Drawdown Indicators

	CIFU	CRMG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-77.20%	-74.38%	-2.82%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-70.91%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-14.97%	-67.87%	+52.90%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-45.12%	-37.81%	-7.31%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	41.08%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CIFU	CRMG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	34.03%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	63.87%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	205.68%	75.31%	+130.37%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	205.68%	75.62%	+130.06%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	205.68%	75.62%	+130.06%

CIFU vs. CRMG - Expense Ratio Comparison

CIFU has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than CRMG's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

CIFU vs. CRMG - Dividend Comparison

Neither CIFU nor CRMG has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CIFU and CRMG in my portfolio?

CIFU and CRMG have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CIFU or CRMG?

On fees, CRMG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CIFU or CRMG?

CRMG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for CIFU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CIFU or CRMG?

CIFU and CRMG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between CIFU and CRMG?

They also come from different issuers: REX and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for CIFU and 0.75% for CRMG.