PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CIFR vs. QQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CIFR vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cipher Mining Inc. (CIFR) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CIFR achieves a 64.57% return, which is significantly higher than QQQ's 16.71% return.


CIFR

1D
8.20%
1M
18.20%
YTD
64.57%
6M
24.69%
1Y
522.82%
3Y*
119.40%
5Y*
10Y*

QQQ

1D
1.56%
1M
0.68%
YTD
16.71%
6M
15.00%
1Y
35.78%
3Y*
27.15%
5Y*
16.98%
10Y*
21.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CIFR vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
CIFR
Cipher Mining Inc.
64.57%218.10%12.35%637.50%-87.90%-54.92%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
16.71%20.77%25.58%54.86%-32.58%4.88%

Correlation

The correlation between CIFR and QQQ is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2021

0.42

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CIFR vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CIFR
CIFR Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
CIFR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CIFR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
CIFR Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
CIFR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
CIFR Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQ
QQQ Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
QQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CIFR vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cipher Mining Inc. (CIFR) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CIFRQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.71

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.38

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

10.27

3.00

+7.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.60

11.43

+9.16

CIFR vs. QQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CIFR Sharpe Ratio is 4.86, which is higher than the QQQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CIFR and QQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CIFRQQQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.86

2.15

+2.71

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.16

0.40

-0.24

Drawdowns

CIFR vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CIFR drawdown since its inception was -97.16%, which is greater than QQQ's maximum drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIFR and QQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CIFRQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.16%

-82.97%

-14.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-51.38%

-11.96%

-39.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-71.74%

-22.77%

-48.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.61%

-4.03%

-3.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-66.47%

-32.77%

-33.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

25.55%

3.14%

+22.41%

Volatility

CIFR vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison

Cipher Mining Inc. (CIFR) has a higher volatility of 27.70% compared to Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) at 6.84%. This indicates that CIFR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CIFRQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

27.70%

6.84%

+20.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

70.95%

13.20%

+57.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

108.62%

16.74%

+91.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

122.03%

22.49%

+99.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

122.03%

22.36%

+99.67%

Dividends

CIFR vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison

CIFR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CIFR
Cipher Mining Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
0.39%0.45%0.56%0.62%0.80%0.43%0.55%0.74%0.91%0.84%1.06%0.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


CIFR and QQQ have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CIFR has higher volatility (27.70%) compared to QQQ (6.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CIFR dropped -97.16% vs QQQ's -82.97%.

CIFR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.86 vs 2.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CIFR and QQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer