PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CIFG vs. TSMG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CIFG vs. TSMG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long CIFR Daily ETF (CIFG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long TSM Daily ETF (TSMG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CIFG achieves a 92.34% return, which is significantly higher than TSMG's 86.06% return.


CIFG

1D
-0.35%
1M
94.51%
YTD
92.34%
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TSMG

1D
-4.26%
1M
15.77%
YTD
86.06%
6M
95.35%
1Y
297.71%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CIFG vs. TSMG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CIFG and TSMG is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2025

0.57

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CIFG vs. TSMG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CIFG

TSMG
TSMG Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
TSMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSMG Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
TSMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSMG Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CIFG vs. TSMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long CIFR Daily ETF (CIFG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long TSM Daily ETF (TSMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CIFG vs. TSMG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CIFGTSMGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.12

1.69

-1.57

Drawdowns

CIFG vs. TSMG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CIFG drawdown since its inception was -71.71%, which is greater than TSMG's maximum drawdown of -63.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIFG and TSMG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CIFGTSMGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.71%

-63.67%

-8.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-35.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.35%

-4.26%

+3.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-38.01%

-16.98%

-21.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.79%

Volatility

CIFG vs. TSMG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CIFGTSMGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

23.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

55.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

203.83%

71.74%

+132.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

203.83%

81.06%

+122.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

203.83%

81.06%

+122.77%

CIFG vs. TSMG - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both CIFG and TSMG have an expense ratio of 0.75%.


Dividends

CIFG vs. TSMG - Dividend Comparison

CIFG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TSMG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.17%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CIFG and TSMG have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CIFG and TSMG have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

TSMG has the higher dividend yield at 6.17%, compared with 0.00% for CIFG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CIFG and TSMG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer