CIFG vs. PALU

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

CIFG (Leverage Shares 2X Long CIFR Daily ETF) and PALU (Direxion Daily PANW Bull 2X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CIFG charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.08%/yr for PALU.

Performance

CIFG vs. PALU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long CIFR Daily ETF (CIFG) and Direxion Daily PANW Bull 2X Shares (PALU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CIFG achieves a -26.74% return, which is significantly lower than PALU's 206.97% return.

CIFG

• 1D: -21.93%
• 1M: -59.11%
• 6M: -46.89%
• YTD: -26.74%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PALU

• 1D: -0.26%
• 1M: 54.64%
• 6M: 197.50%
• YTD: 206.97%
• 1Y: 155.64%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CIFG vs. PALU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CIFG Leverage Shares 2X Long CIFR Daily ETF	-26.74%	-32.52%
PALU Direxion Daily PANW Bull 2X Shares	206.97%	-9.72%

Correlation

The correlation between CIFG and PALU is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2025	0.05

Return for Risk

CIFG vs. PALU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CIFG

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

PALU

PALU Risk / Return Rank: 60
PALU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
PALU Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
PALU Omega Ratio Rank: 63
PALU Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
PALU Martin Ratio Rank: 40

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CIFG vs. PALU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long CIFR Daily ETF (CIFG) and Direxion Daily PANW Bull 2X Shares (PALU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CIFG	PALU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.88	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.34	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.30	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.52	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	5.06	—

Drawdowns

CIFG vs. PALU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CIFG drawdown since its inception was -71.71%, which is greater than PALU's maximum drawdown of -62.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIFG and PALU.

Drawdown Indicators

	CIFG	PALU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-71.71%	-62.18%	-9.53%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-62.18%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-66.62%	-3.81%	-62.81%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-36.36%	-21.35%	-15.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	30.87%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CIFG	PALU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	33.33%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	71.31%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	206.17%	83.11%	+123.06%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	206.17%	84.10%	+122.07%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	206.17%	84.10%	+122.07%

CIFG vs. PALU - Expense Ratio Comparison

CIFG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than PALU's 1.08% expense ratio.

Dividends

CIFG vs. PALU - Dividend Comparison

CIFG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PALU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.55%.

Position	TTM	2025
CIFG Leverage Shares 2X Long CIFR Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%
PALU Direxion Daily PANW Bull 2X Shares	3.55%	10.50%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CIFG and PALU in my portfolio?

CIFG and PALU have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CIFG or PALU?

On fees, CIFG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CIFG or PALU?

CIFG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.08% for PALU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CIFG or PALU?

PALU has the higher dividend yield at 3.55%, compared with 0.00% for CIFG.

What is the main difference between CIFG and PALU?

They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for CIFG and 1.08% for PALU.