CIFG vs. NTSD
CIFG (Leverage Shares 2X Long CIFR Daily ETF) and NTSD (WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CIFG charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for NTSD.
Performance
CIFG vs. NTSD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CIFG
- 1D
- -3.87%
- 1M
- 42.24%
- YTD
- 96.56%
- 6M
- 67.07%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NTSD
- 1D
- -2.11%
- 1M
- -0.58%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CIFG vs. NTSD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
CIFG Leverage Shares 2X Long CIFR Daily ETF | 156.22% |
NTSD WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund | 15.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between CIFG and NTSD is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2026 | 0.62 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CIFG vs. NTSD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long CIFR Daily ETF (CIFG) and WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund (NTSD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CIFG vs. NTSD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CIFG drawdown since its inception was -71.71%, which is greater than NTSD's maximum drawdown of -5.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIFG and NTSD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CIFG | NTSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.71% | -5.58% | -66.13% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.44% | -2.97% | -7.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -35.54% | -1.09% | -34.45% |
Volatility
CIFG vs. NTSD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CIFG | NTSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 205.93% | 25.11% | +180.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 205.93% | 25.11% | +180.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 205.93% | 25.11% | +180.82% |
CIFG vs. NTSD - Expense Ratio Comparison
CIFG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than NTSD's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
CIFG vs. NTSD - Dividend Comparison
Neither CIFG nor NTSD has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CIFG and NTSD have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NTSD is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NTSD is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for CIFG.
CIFG and NTSD have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for CIFG and 0.35% for NTSD.
Find the right allocation for CIFG and NTSD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer