CIFG vs. CSEX
CIFG (Leverage Shares 2X Long CIFR Daily ETF) and CSEX (Tradr 2X Long CLS Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CIFG charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.30%/yr for CSEX.
Performance
CIFG vs. CSEX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CIFG achieves a 96.56% return, which is significantly higher than CSEX's 1.49% return.
CIFG
- 1D
- -3.87%
- 1M
- 42.24%
- YTD
- 96.56%
- 6M
- 67.07%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CSEX
- 1D
- -13.07%
- 1M
- -15.52%
- YTD
- 1.49%
- 6M
- -3.86%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CIFG vs. CSEX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CIFG Leverage Shares 2X Long CIFR Daily ETF | 96.56% | -32.52% |
CSEX Tradr 2X Long CLS Daily ETF | 1.49% | -30.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between CIFG and CSEX is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2025 | 0.49 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CIFG vs. CSEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long CIFR Daily ETF (CIFG) and Tradr 2X Long CLS Daily ETF (CSEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CIFG vs. CSEX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CIFG drawdown since its inception was -71.71%, which is greater than CSEX's maximum drawdown of -56.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIFG and CSEX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CIFG | CSEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.71% | -56.45% | -15.26% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.44% | -47.27% | +36.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -35.54% | -28.34% | -7.20% |
Volatility
CIFG vs. CSEX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CIFG | CSEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 205.93% | 156.91% | +49.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 205.93% | 156.91% | +49.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 205.93% | 156.91% | +49.02% |
CIFG vs. CSEX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CIFG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than CSEX's 1.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
CIFG vs. CSEX - Dividend Comparison
Neither CIFG nor CSEX has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CIFG and CSEX have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CIFG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CIFG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for CSEX.
CIFG and CSEX have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Tradr. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for CIFG and 1.30% for CSEX.
Find the right allocation for CIFG and CSEX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer