CIFG vs. ADBG
CIFG (Leverage Shares 2X Long CIFR Daily ETF) and ADBG (Leverage Shares 2X Long ADBE Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Leverage Shares. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.23, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.
Performance
CIFG vs. ADBG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CIFG achieves a 96.56% return, which is significantly higher than ADBG's -72.70% return.
CIFG
- 1D
- -3.87%
- 1M
- 42.24%
- YTD
- 96.56%
- 6M
- 67.07%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ADBG
- 1D
- 2.95%
- 1M
- -37.44%
- YTD
- -72.70%
- 6M
- -73.10%
- 1Y
- -79.05%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CIFG vs. ADBG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CIFG Leverage Shares 2X Long CIFR Daily ETF | 96.56% | -32.52% |
ADBG Leverage Shares 2X Long ADBE Daily ETF | -72.70% | 2.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between CIFG and ADBG is -0.23, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2025 | -0.23 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CIFG vs. ADBG — Risk / Return Rank
CIFG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ADBG
CIFG vs. ADBG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long CIFR Daily ETF (CIFG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long ADBE Daily ETF (ADBG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CIFG | ADBG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.72 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.98 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -1.68 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CIFG vs. ADBG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CIFG drawdown since its inception was -71.71%, smaller than the maximum ADBG drawdown of -83.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIFG and ADBG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CIFG | ADBG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.71% | -83.90% | +12.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -80.96% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.44% | -83.42% | +72.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -35.54% | -43.05% | +7.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 47.09% | — |
Volatility
CIFG vs. ADBG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CIFG | ADBG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 32.31% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 59.28% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 205.93% | 69.23% | +136.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 205.93% | 68.74% | +137.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 205.93% | 68.74% | +137.19% |
CIFG vs. ADBG - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both CIFG and ADBG have an expense ratio of 0.75%.
Dividends
CIFG vs. ADBG - Dividend Comparison
Neither CIFG nor ADBG has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CIFG and ADBG have a correlation of -0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CIFG and ADBG have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.
CIFG and ADBG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
Find the right allocation for CIFG and ADBG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer