CICHY vs. LLY
CICHY (China Construction Bank Corp) and LLY (Eli Lilly and Company) are both stocks. CICHY operates in Banks - Diversified (Financial Services), while LLY operates in Drug Manufacturers - General (Healthcare). Over the past 10 years, CICHY returned 13.46%/yr vs 33.08%/yr for LLY. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CICHY vs. LLY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CICHY achieves a 11.00% return, which is significantly higher than LLY's 2.90% return. Over the past 10 years, CICHY has underperformed LLY with an annualized return of 13.46%, while LLY has yielded a comparatively higher 33.08% annualized return.
CICHY
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- -1.75%
- YTD
- 11.00%
- 6M
- 12.94%
- 1Y
- 14.40%
- 3Y*
- 30.93%
- 5Y*
- 15.40%
- 10Y*
- 13.46%
LLY
- 1D
- 0.32%
- 1M
- 3.48%
- YTD
- 2.90%
- 6M
- 2.73%
- 1Y
- 45.51%
- 3Y*
- 34.88%
- 5Y*
- 39.70%
- 10Y*
- 33.08%
CICHY vs. LLY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CICHY China Construction Bank Corp | 11.00% | 31.78% | 49.67% | 4.46% | -2.29% | -3.15% | -8.81% | 11.09% | -7.66% | 33.81% |
LLY Eli Lilly and Company | 2.90% | 40.25% | 33.30% | 60.91% | 34.26% | 66.08% | 31.04% | 16.14% | 40.45% | 17.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between CICHY and LLY is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 12, 2009 | 0.18 |
The correlation between CICHY and LLY shifts across timeframes, from 0.05 (5 years) to 0.18 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CICHY:
$286.33B
LLY:
$987.35B
CICHY:
CN¥24.86
LLY:
$28.14
CICHY:
5.96
LLY:
39.16
CICHY:
0.57
LLY:
0.79
CICHY:
1.78
LLY:
13.70
CICHY:
0.53
LLY:
31.65
CICHY:
CN¥1.14T
LLY:
$72.25B
CICHY:
CN¥760.54B
LLY:
$59.75B
CICHY:
CN¥402.61B
LLY:
$32.97B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CICHY vs. LLY — Risk / Return Rank
CICHY
LLY
CICHY vs. LLY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for China Construction Bank Corp (CICHY) and Eli Lilly and Company (LLY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CICHY | LLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.24 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.93 | 1.97 | -1.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.45 | 4.93 | -2.48 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CICHY vs. LLY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CICHY drawdown since its inception was -44.82%, smaller than the maximum LLY drawdown of -68.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CICHY and LLY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CICHY | LLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.82% | -68.24% | +23.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.49% | -23.18% | +7.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.49% | -34.48% | +18.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.91% | -34.48% | +6.57% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.27% | -34.48% | -5.79% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.53% | -5.07% | +0.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.30% | -19.20% | +0.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.89% | 9.26% | -3.37% |
Volatility
CICHY vs. LLY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for China Construction Bank Corp (CICHY) is 5.94%, while Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) has a volatility of 8.76%. This indicates that CICHY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LLY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CICHY | LLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.94% | 8.76% | -2.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.84% | 26.89% | -13.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.87% | 37.90% | -18.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.24% | 32.46% | -11.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.84% | 30.20% | -7.36% |
Dividends
CICHY vs. LLY - Dividend Comparison
CICHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.39%, more than LLY's 0.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CICHY China Construction Bank Corp | 2.39% | 8.26% | 6.71% | 9.13% | 8.70% | 6.32% | 5.08% | 4.42% | 4.80% | 8.33% | 10.74% | 6.14% |
LLY Eli Lilly and Company | 0.59% | 0.56% | 0.67% | 0.78% | 1.07% | 1.23% | 1.75% | 1.96% | 1.94% | 2.46% | 2.77% | 2.37% |
Financials
CICHY vs. LLY - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between China Construction Bank Corp and Eli Lilly and Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CICHY vs. LLY - Profitability Comparison
CICHY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, China Construction Bank Corp reported a gross profit of 211.00B and revenue of 345.49B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 61.1%.
LLY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Eli Lilly and Company reported a gross profit of 15.64B and revenue of 19.80B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 79.0%.
CICHY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, China Construction Bank Corp reported an operating income of 99.20B and revenue of 345.49B, resulting in an operating margin of 28.7%.
LLY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Eli Lilly and Company reported an operating income of 9.19B and revenue of 19.80B, resulting in an operating margin of 46.4%.
CICHY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, China Construction Bank Corp reported a net income of 86.29B and revenue of 345.49B, resulting in a net margin of 25.0%.
LLY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Eli Lilly and Company reported a net income of 7.40B and revenue of 19.80B, resulting in a net margin of 37.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CICHY and LLY have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LLY has higher volatility (8.76%) compared to CICHY (5.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CICHY dropped -44.82% vs LLY's -68.24%.
LLY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.21 vs 0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CICHY and LLY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer