CIB vs. HL
CIB (Bancolombia S.A.) and HL (Hecla Mining Company) are both stocks. CIB operates in Banks - Regional (Financial Services), while HL operates in Gold (Basic Materials). Over the past 10 years, CIB returned 14.75%/yr vs 13.21%/yr for HL. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CIB vs. HL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CIB achieves a 14.89% return, which is significantly higher than HL's -22.38% return. Over the past 10 years, CIB has outperformed HL with an annualized return of 14.75%, while HL has yielded a comparatively lower 13.21% annualized return.
CIB
- 1D
- 1.30%
- 1M
- 10.00%
- YTD
- 14.89%
- 6M
- 17.10%
- 1Y
- 69.72%
- 3Y*
- 51.05%
- 5Y*
- 29.38%
- 10Y*
- 14.75%
HL
- 1D
- 0.74%
- 1M
- -19.97%
- YTD
- -22.38%
- 6M
- -6.02%
- 1Y
- 137.76%
- 3Y*
- 41.41%
- 5Y*
- 11.39%
- 10Y*
- 13.21%
CIB vs. HL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIB Bancolombia S.A. | 14.89% | 124.16% | 13.78% | 22.08% | -0.31% | -20.69% | -22.31% | 47.45% | -0.72% | 11.41% |
HL Hecla Mining Company | -22.38% | 291.70% | 2.82% | -12.93% | 6.99% | -18.97% | 91.83% | 44.43% | -40.37% | -24.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between CIB and HL is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 27, 1995 | 0.17 |
The correlation between CIB and HL shifts across timeframes, from 0.17 (all time) to 0.31 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CIB:
$17.04B
HL:
$10.05B
CIB:
$29.17K
HL:
$0.84
CIB:
0.00
HL:
17.71
CIB:
0.00
HL:
0.07
CIB:
0.00
HL:
6.30
CIB:
0.00
HL:
3.91
CIB:
$43.34T
HL:
$1.57B
CIB:
$25.71T
HL:
$788.95M
CIB:
$10.37T
HL:
$864.40M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CIB vs. HL — Risk / Return Rank
CIB
HL
CIB vs. HL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bancolombia S.A. (CIB) and Hecla Mining Company (HL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CIB | HL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.30 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.93 | 2.59 | +0.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.27 | 5.82 | +1.44 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CIB | HL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.20 | 1.92 | +0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 | 0.19 | +0.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.41 | 0.21 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.25 | 0.00 | +0.25 |
Drawdowns
CIB vs. HL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CIB drawdown since its inception was -93.77%, roughly equal to the maximum HL drawdown of -97.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIB and HL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CIB | HL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.77% | -97.92% | +4.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.95% | -53.52% | +29.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.95% | -53.52% | +29.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.85% | -63.18% | +16.33% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -70.38% | -82.45% | +12.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.55% | -53.17% | +39.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.62% | -69.95% | +37.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.63% | 23.76% | -14.13% |
Volatility
CIB vs. HL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Bancolombia S.A. (CIB) is 12.58%, while Hecla Mining Company (HL) has a volatility of 24.76%. This indicates that CIB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CIB | HL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.58% | 24.76% | -12.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.42% | 55.25% | -28.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.85% | 72.35% | -40.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.68% | 59.31% | -26.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.74% | 62.76% | -27.02% |
Dividends
CIB vs. HL - Dividend Comparison
CIB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.70%, more than HL's 0.10% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIB Bancolombia S.A. | 1.70% | 6.90% | 10.96% | 10.92% | 10.68% | 0.87% | 4.01% | 2.41% | 3.62% | 3.21% | 3.21% | 4.49% |
HL Hecla Mining Company | 0.10% | 0.08% | 0.81% | 0.65% | 0.40% | 0.72% | 0.25% | 0.29% | 0.42% | 0.25% | 0.19% | 0.53% |
Financials
CIB vs. HL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Bancolombia S.A. and Hecla Mining Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CIB vs. HL - Profitability Comparison
CIB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bancolombia S.A. reported a gross profit of 6.19T and revenue of 10.46T. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 59.2%.
HL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hecla Mining Company reported a gross profit of 253.26M and revenue of 411.43M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 61.6%.
CIB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bancolombia S.A. reported an operating income of 2.15T and revenue of 10.46T, resulting in an operating margin of 20.5%.
HL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hecla Mining Company reported an operating income of 223.11M and revenue of 411.43M, resulting in an operating margin of 54.2%.
CIB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bancolombia S.A. reported a net income of 1.46T and revenue of 10.46T, resulting in a net margin of 13.9%.
HL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hecla Mining Company reported a net income of 266.45M and revenue of 411.43M, resulting in a net margin of 64.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CIB and HL have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HL has higher volatility (24.76%) compared to CIB (12.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CIB dropped -93.77% vs HL's -97.92%.
CIB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 1.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CIB and HL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer