PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CI vs. USO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CI vs. USO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Cigna Group (CI) and United States Oil Fund LP (USO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CI achieves a 2.54% return, which is significantly lower than USO's 86.77% return. Over the past 10 years, CI has outperformed USO with an annualized return of 9.54%, while USO has yielded a comparatively lower 5.64% annualized return.


CI

1D
-2.99%
1M
-3.03%
6M
2.96%
YTD
2.54%
1Y
8.77%
3Y*
-0.02%
5Y*
5.92%
10Y*
9.54%
ALL TIME*
10.94%

USO

1D
1.33%
1M
24.23%
6M
62.44%
YTD
86.77%
1Y
66.76%
3Y*
20.97%
5Y*
20.59%
10Y*
5.64%
ALL TIME*
-6.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$460.57M$474.33M$477.27M
$968.42M$871.56M$931.57M

CI vs. USO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CI
The Cigna Group
2.54%1.72%-6.27%-7.97%46.68%12.29%1.83%7.70%-6.46%52.29%
USO
United States Oil Fund LP
86.77%-8.46%13.35%-4.94%28.97%64.68%-67.79%32.61%-19.57%2.47%

Correlation

The correlation between CI and USO is -0.06, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

-0.04

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.06

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 10, 2006

0.15

The correlation between CI and USO shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (1 year) to 0.15 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CI vs. USO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CI
CI Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
CI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CI Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
CI Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
CI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
CI Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

USO
USO Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
USO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
USO Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
USO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
USO Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CI vs. USO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Cigna Group (CI) and United States Oil Fund LP (USO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CIUSODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.25

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.31

1.93

-1.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.74

5.60

-4.85

CI vs. USO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CI Sharpe Ratio is 0.21, which is lower than the USO Sharpe Ratio of 1.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CI and USO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CI vs. USO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CI drawdown since its inception was -84.34%, smaller than the maximum USO drawdown of -98.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CI and USO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CIUSODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.34%

-98.19%

+13.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.41%

-32.49%

+11.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.10%

-32.49%

+0.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.10%

-36.23%

+4.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.47%

-86.75%

+44.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.16%

-86.26%

+65.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.82%

-75.38%

+56.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.02%

12.03%

-3.01%

Volatility

CI vs. USO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for The Cigna Group (CI) is 10.65%, while United States Oil Fund LP (USO) has a volatility of 17.73%. This indicates that CI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CIUSODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.65%

17.73%

-7.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.43%

42.79%

-22.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

33.83%

46.91%

-13.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.73%

37.06%

-8.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.70%

39.29%

-8.59%

Dividends

CI vs. USO - Dividend Comparison

CI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.20%, while USO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CI
The Cigna Group
2.20%2.19%2.03%1.64%1.35%1.74%0.02%0.02%0.02%0.02%0.03%0.03%
USO
United States Oil Fund LP
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CI and USO have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

USO has higher volatility (17.73%) compared to CI (10.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CI dropped -84.34% vs USO's -98.19%.

USO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.34 vs 0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CI and USO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer