PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CI vs. JFLI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CI vs. JFLI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cigna Corporation (CI) and JPMorgan Flexible Income ETF (JFLI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with CI having a 9.50% return and JFLI slightly lower at 9.19%.


CI

1D
1.07%
1M
-0.33%
YTD
9.50%
6M
9.71%
1Y
-3.41%
3Y*
5.04%
5Y*
6.20%
10Y*
9.98%

JFLI

1D
0.50%
1M
1.33%
YTD
9.19%
6M
9.45%
1Y
19.16%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CI vs. JFLI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
CI
Cigna Corporation
9.50%-4.03%
JFLI
JPMorgan Flexible Income ETF
9.19%9.73%

Correlation

The correlation between CI and JFLI is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2025

0.11

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CI vs. JFLI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CI
CI Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
CI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CI Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
CI Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
CI Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
CI Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

JFLI
JFLI Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
JFLI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JFLI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
JFLI Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
JFLI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
JFLI Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CI vs. JFLI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cigna Corporation (CI) and JPMorgan Flexible Income ETF (JFLI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CIJFLIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.41

-0.40

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.13

2.88

-3.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.23

13.53

-13.76

CI vs. JFLI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CI Sharpe Ratio is -0.10, which is lower than the JFLI Sharpe Ratio of 2.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CI and JFLI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CI vs. JFLI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CI drawdown since its inception was -84.34%, which is greater than JFLI's maximum drawdown of -12.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CI and JFLI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CIJFLIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.34%

-12.87%

-71.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.54%

-6.67%

-19.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.81%

-0.97%

-14.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.82%

-1.44%

-17.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.58%

1.42%

+13.16%

Volatility

CI vs. JFLI - Volatility Comparison

Cigna Corporation (CI) has a higher volatility of 8.88% compared to JPMorgan Flexible Income ETF (JFLI) at 3.86%. This indicates that CI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JFLI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CIJFLIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.88%

3.86%

+5.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.91%

7.63%

+11.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

33.22%

8.98%

+24.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.41%

12.09%

+16.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.75%

12.09%

+18.66%

Dividends

CI vs. JFLI - Dividend Comparison

CI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.06%, less than JFLI's 7.24% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CI
Cigna Corporation
2.06%2.19%2.03%1.64%1.35%1.74%0.02%0.02%0.02%0.02%0.03%0.03%
JFLI
JPMorgan Flexible Income ETF
7.24%6.81%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CI and JFLI have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CI has higher volatility (8.88%) compared to JFLI (3.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CI dropped -84.34% vs JFLI's -12.87%.

JFLI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs -0.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CI and JFLI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer