CI vs. GPN
CI (Cigna Corporation) and GPN (Global Payments Inc.) are both stocks. CI operates in Healthcare Plans (Healthcare), while GPN operates in Specialty Business Services (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, CI returned 9.98%/yr vs -0.28%/yr for GPN. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CI vs. GPN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CI achieves a 9.50% return, which is significantly higher than GPN's -11.90% return. Over the past 10 years, CI has outperformed GPN with an annualized return of 9.98%, while GPN has yielded a comparatively lower -0.28% annualized return.
CI
- 1D
- 1.07%
- 1M
- -0.33%
- YTD
- 9.50%
- 6M
- 9.71%
- 1Y
- -3.41%
- 3Y*
- 5.04%
- 5Y*
- 6.20%
- 10Y*
- 9.98%
GPN
- 1D
- 3.87%
- 1M
- 1.43%
- YTD
- -11.90%
- 6M
- -16.89%
- 1Y
- -12.09%
- 3Y*
- -11.36%
- 5Y*
- -18.15%
- 10Y*
- -0.28%
CI vs. GPN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CI Cigna Corporation | 9.50% | 1.72% | -6.27% | -7.97% | 46.68% | 12.29% | 1.83% | 7.70% | -6.46% | 52.29% |
GPN Global Payments Inc. | -11.90% | -30.11% | -10.97% | 29.02% | -25.91% | -36.91% | 18.51% | 77.25% | 2.92% | 44.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between CI and GPN is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 16, 2001 | 0.30 |
The correlation between CI and GPN shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (3 years) to 0.30 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CI:
$23.59
GPN:
-$3.90
CI:
0.29
GPN:
1.39
CI:
$277.94B
GPN:
$8.83B
CI:
$19.38B
GPN:
$4.25B
CI:
$10.03B
GPN:
$2.27B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CI vs. GPN — Risk / Return Rank
CI
GPN
CI vs. GPN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cigna Corporation (CI) and Global Payments Inc. (GPN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CI | GPN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 0.98 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.13 | -0.41 | +0.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.23 | -0.81 | +0.58 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CI vs. GPN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CI drawdown since its inception was -84.34%, which is greater than GPN's maximum drawdown of -70.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CI and GPN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CI | GPN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.34% | -70.17% | -14.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.54% | -29.95% | +3.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.10% | -53.95% | +21.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.10% | -66.52% | +34.42% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.47% | -70.17% | +27.70% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.81% | -67.54% | +51.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.82% | -18.90% | +0.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.58% | 14.92% | -0.34% |
Volatility
CI vs. GPN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Cigna Corporation (CI) is 8.88%, while Global Payments Inc. (GPN) has a volatility of 13.23%. This indicates that CI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GPN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CI | GPN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.88% | 13.23% | -4.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.91% | 30.58% | -11.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.22% | 39.63% | -6.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.41% | 36.64% | -8.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.75% | 34.55% | -3.80% |
Dividends
CI vs. GPN - Dividend Comparison
CI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.06%, more than GPN's 1.85% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CI Cigna Corporation | 2.06% | 2.19% | 2.03% | 1.64% | 1.35% | 1.74% | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.03% | 0.03% |
GPN Global Payments Inc. | 1.85% | 1.29% | 0.89% | 0.79% | 1.01% | 0.66% | 0.36% | 0.12% | 0.04% | 0.04% | 0.06% | 0.06% |
Financials
CI vs. GPN - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cigna Corporation and Global Payments Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CI vs. GPN - Profitability Comparison
CI - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cigna Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 68.49B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
GPN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Global Payments Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 2.97B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
CI - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cigna Corporation reported an operating income of 2.36B and revenue of 68.49B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.4%.
GPN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Global Payments Inc. reported an operating income of -15.65M and revenue of 2.97B, resulting in an operating margin of -0.5%.
CI - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cigna Corporation reported a net income of 1.65B and revenue of 68.49B, resulting in a net margin of 2.4%.
GPN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Global Payments Inc. reported a net income of -1.80B and revenue of 2.97B, resulting in a net margin of -60.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CI and GPN have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GPN has higher volatility (13.23%) compared to CI (8.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CI dropped -84.34% vs GPN's -70.17%.
CI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.10 vs -0.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CI and GPN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer