CI vs. CVS
CI (Cigna Corporation) and CVS (CVS Health Corporation) are both stocks. Both operate in the Healthcare Plans industry within the Healthcare sector. Over the past 10 years, CI returned 9.53%/yr vs 3.04%/yr for CVS. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CI vs. CVS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CI achieves a 6.37% return, which is significantly lower than CVS's 22.94% return. Over the past 10 years, CI has outperformed CVS with an annualized return of 9.53%, while CVS has yielded a comparatively lower 3.04% annualized return.
CI
- 1D
- 3.14%
- 1M
- 3.25%
- YTD
- 6.37%
- 6M
- 10.29%
- 1Y
- -4.86%
- 3Y*
- 5.21%
- 5Y*
- 4.73%
- 10Y*
- 9.53%
CVS
- 1D
- 1.17%
- 1M
- 10.44%
- YTD
- 22.94%
- 6M
- 29.01%
- 1Y
- 57.64%
- 3Y*
- 15.19%
- 5Y*
- 5.54%
- 10Y*
- 3.04%
CI vs. CVS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CI Cigna Corporation | 6.37% | 1.72% | -6.27% | -7.97% | 46.68% | 12.29% | 1.83% | 7.70% | -6.46% | 52.29% |
CVS CVS Health Corporation | 22.94% | 84.35% | -40.77% | -12.53% | -7.63% | 54.87% | -5.14% | 17.26% | -7.04% | -5.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between CI and CVS is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 1984 | 0.33 |
Over the past year, CI and CVS have become more correlated (0.54) than their long-term average of 0.33, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
CI:
$76.43B
CVS:
$122.69B
CI:
$23.59
CVS:
$2.30
CI:
12.27
CVS:
41.67
CI:
0.28
CVS:
0.30
CI:
1.81
CVS:
1.58
CI:
$277.94B
CVS:
$407.91B
CI:
$19.38B
CVS:
$56.59B
CI:
$10.03B
CVS:
$9.99B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CI vs. CVS — Risk / Return Rank
CI
CVS
CI vs. CVS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cigna Corporation (CI) and CVS Health Corporation (CVS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CI | CVS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.35 | -0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.18 | 3.52 | -3.71 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.34 | 9.07 | -9.40 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CI | CVS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.15 | 1.87 | -2.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 | 0.19 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.31 | 0.10 | +0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.34 | 0.33 | +0.01 |
Drawdowns
CI vs. CVS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CI drawdown since its inception was -84.34%, which is greater than CVS's maximum drawdown of -64.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CI and CVS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CI | CVS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.34% | -64.07% | -20.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.54% | -16.44% | -10.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.10% | -43.98% | +11.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.10% | -56.79% | +24.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.47% | -56.79% | +14.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.21% | -2.22% | -15.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.82% | -19.55% | +0.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.51% | 6.37% | +8.14% |
Volatility
CI vs. CVS - Volatility Comparison
Cigna Corporation (CI) has a higher volatility of 9.35% compared to CVS Health Corporation (CVS) at 8.85%. This indicates that CI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CVS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CI | CVS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.35% | 8.85% | +0.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.86% | 25.97% | -7.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.18% | 31.01% | +2.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.43% | 29.95% | -1.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.75% | 29.30% | +1.45% |
Dividends
CI vs. CVS - Dividend Comparison
CI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.12%, less than CVS's 2.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CI Cigna Corporation | 2.12% | 2.19% | 2.03% | 1.64% | 1.35% | 1.74% | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.03% | 0.03% |
CVS CVS Health Corporation | 2.77% | 3.35% | 5.93% | 3.06% | 2.36% | 1.94% | 2.93% | 2.69% | 3.05% | 2.76% | 2.15% | 1.43% |
Financials
CI vs. CVS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cigna Corporation and CVS Health Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CI vs. CVS - Profitability Comparison
CI - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cigna Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 68.49B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
CVS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CVS Health Corporation reported a gross profit of 15.62B and revenue of 100.43B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 15.6%.
CI - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cigna Corporation reported an operating income of 2.36B and revenue of 68.49B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.4%.
CVS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CVS Health Corporation reported an operating income of 4.68B and revenue of 100.43B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.7%.
CI - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cigna Corporation reported a net income of 1.65B and revenue of 68.49B, resulting in a net margin of 2.4%.
CVS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CVS Health Corporation reported a net income of 2.94B and revenue of 100.43B, resulting in a net margin of 2.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CI and CVS have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CI has higher volatility (9.35%) compared to CVS (8.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CI dropped -84.34% vs CVS's -64.07%.
CVS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs -0.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CI and CVS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer