CHSPI.SW vs. GC=F
CHSPI.SW (iShares Core SPI® ETF (CH)) is Europe Equities fund tracking the Swiss Performance Index, while GC=F (Gold Futures) is an asset. Over the past 10 years, CHSPI.SW returned 7.78%/yr vs 11.31%/yr for GC=F. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CHSPI.SW vs. GC=F - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
CHSPI.SW is traded in CHF, while GC=F is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the GC=F values have been converted to CHF using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with CHSPI.SW having a 2.84% return and GC=F slightly higher at 2.88%. Over the past 10 years, CHSPI.SW has underperformed GC=F with an annualized return of 7.78%, while GC=F has yielded a comparatively higher 11.31% annualized return.
CHSPI.SW
- 1D
- -0.59%
- 1M
- 1.86%
- YTD
- 2.84%
- 6M
- 5.90%
- 1Y
- 11.09%
- 3Y*
- 7.41%
- 5Y*
- 4.57%
- 10Y*
- 7.78%
GC=F
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- -0.37%
- YTD
- 2.88%
- 6M
- 5.17%
- 1Y
- 27.89%
- 3Y*
- 25.77%
- 5Y*
- 15.75%
- 10Y*
- 11.31%
CHSPI.SW vs. GC=F - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHSPI.SW iShares Core SPI® ETF (CH) | 2.84% | 17.87% | 5.72% | 5.96% | -16.46% | 23.33% | 4.07% | 30.42% | -8.30% | 19.00% |
GC=F Gold Futures | 2.88% | 43.75% | 37.53% | 3.19% | 0.94% | -0.62% | 14.08% | 16.85% | -1.19% | 8.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between CHSPI.SW and GC=F is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 30, 2014 | 0.03 |
The correlation between CHSPI.SW and GC=F shifts across timeframes, from 0.03 (10 years) to 0.13 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CHSPI.SW vs. GC=F — Risk / Return Rank
CHSPI.SW
GC=F
CHSPI.SW vs. GC=F - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core SPI® ETF (CH) (CHSPI.SW) and Gold Futures (GC=F). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CHSPI.SW | GC=F | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.23 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.07 | 1.69 | -0.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.88 | 4.25 | -0.37 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CHSPI.SW | GC=F | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 | 1.06 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 | 0.92 | -0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 | 0.73 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.45 | +0.02 |
Drawdowns
CHSPI.SW vs. GC=F - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CHSPI.SW drawdown since its inception was -26.58%, smaller than the maximum GC=F drawdown of -37.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHSPI.SW and GC=F.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CHSPI.SW | GC=F | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.58% | -37.49% | +10.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.56% | -16.01% | +5.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.00% | -16.01% | +0.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.75% | -16.01% | -5.74% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -26.58% | -16.01% | -10.57% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.49% | -14.39% | +11.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.61% | -13.72% | +8.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.88% | 6.45% | -3.57% |
Volatility
CHSPI.SW vs. GC=F - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core SPI® ETF (CH) (CHSPI.SW) is 3.42%, while Gold Futures (GC=F) has a volatility of 4.77%. This indicates that CHSPI.SW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GC=F based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CHSPI.SW | GC=F | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.42% | 4.77% | -1.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.58% | 21.98% | -12.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.91% | 25.40% | -13.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.55% | 17.10% | -3.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.30% | 15.44% | -1.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CHSPI.SW and GC=F have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for CHSPI.SW and GC=F
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer