PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CHSPI.SW vs. SPICHA.SW
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CHSPI.SW vs. SPICHA.SW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CHF 10,000 investment in iShares Core SPI® ETF (CH) (CHSPI.SW) and UBS ETF (CH) – SPI® (CHF) A-dis (SPICHA.SW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CHSPI.SW vs. SPICHA.SW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CHSPI.SW
iShares Core SPI® ETF (CH)
-1.94%17.87%5.72%5.96%-16.46%23.33%4.07%30.42%-9.37%19.00%
SPICHA.SW
UBS ETF (CH) – SPI® (CHF) A-dis
-2.50%17.33%6.05%5.82%-16.70%23.29%3.83%29.94%-8.35%19.42%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CHSPI.SW achieves a -1.94% return, which is significantly higher than SPICHA.SW's -2.50% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with CHSPI.SW having a 7.91% annualized return and SPICHA.SW not far behind at 7.87%.


CHSPI.SW

1D
0.85%
1M
-7.01%
YTD
-1.94%
6M
6.73%
1Y
6.22%
3Y*
6.99%
5Y*
4.72%
10Y*
7.91%

SPICHA.SW

1D
0.80%
1M
-7.62%
YTD
-2.50%
6M
6.11%
1Y
5.39%
3Y*
6.68%
5Y*
4.51%
10Y*
7.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CHSPI.SW vs. SPICHA.SW - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both CHSPI.SW and SPICHA.SW have an expense ratio of 0.10%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

CHSPI.SW vs. SPICHA.SW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CHSPI.SW
CHSPI.SW Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
CHSPI.SW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHSPI.SW Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHSPI.SW Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
CHSPI.SW Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHSPI.SW Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

SPICHA.SW
SPICHA.SW Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
SPICHA.SW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPICHA.SW Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPICHA.SW Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
SPICHA.SW Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPICHA.SW Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CHSPI.SW vs. SPICHA.SW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core SPI® ETF (CH) (CHSPI.SW) and UBS ETF (CH) – SPI® (CHF) A-dis (SPICHA.SW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CHSPI.SWSPICHA.SWDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.42

0.38

+0.04

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.62

0.57

+0.05

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.09

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.28

0.22

+0.06

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.13

0.89

+0.25

CHSPI.SW vs. SPICHA.SW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CHSPI.SW Sharpe Ratio is 0.42, which is comparable to the SPICHA.SW Sharpe Ratio of 0.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CHSPI.SW and SPICHA.SW, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CHSPI.SWSPICHA.SWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

0.38

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

0.35

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

0.57

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.54

-0.11

Correlation

The correlation between CHSPI.SW and SPICHA.SW is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

CHSPI.SW vs. SPICHA.SW - Dividend Comparison

CHSPI.SW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.89%, more than SPICHA.SW's 2.04% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CHSPI.SW
iShares Core SPI® ETF (CH)
2.89%2.65%2.98%2.94%2.84%2.27%2.59%2.66%2.59%2.71%3.15%2.67%
SPICHA.SW
UBS ETF (CH) – SPI® (CHF) A-dis
2.04%2.38%2.96%2.94%2.83%2.26%2.55%2.60%3.21%2.62%3.04%2.87%

Drawdowns

CHSPI.SW vs. SPICHA.SW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CHSPI.SW drawdown since its inception was -26.58%, roughly equal to the maximum SPICHA.SW drawdown of -26.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHSPI.SW and SPICHA.SW.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CHSPI.SWSPICHA.SWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.58%

-26.92%

+0.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.70%

-13.73%

+0.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.75%

-21.48%

-0.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.58%

-26.92%

+0.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.01%

-7.62%

+0.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.72%

-5.23%

-0.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.63%

3.69%

-0.06%

Volatility

CHSPI.SW vs. SPICHA.SW - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core SPI® ETF (CH) (CHSPI.SW) has a higher volatility of 6.40% compared to UBS ETF (CH) – SPI® (CHF) A-dis (SPICHA.SW) at 5.43%. This indicates that CHSPI.SW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPICHA.SW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CHSPI.SWSPICHA.SWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.40%

5.43%

+0.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.74%

8.28%

+0.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.14%

14.57%

+0.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.43%

13.07%

+0.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.26%

13.89%

+0.37%