CHRW vs. EWO
CHRW (C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.) is a stock, while EWO (iShares MSCI Austria ETF) is Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI Austria Investable Market Index. Over the past 10 years, CHRW returned 11.95%/yr vs 14.00%/yr for EWO. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CHRW vs. EWO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CHRW achieves a 12.81% return, which is significantly lower than EWO's 14.52% return. Over the past 10 years, CHRW has underperformed EWO with an annualized return of 11.95%, while EWO has yielded a comparatively higher 14.00% annualized return.
CHRW
- 1D
- 1.24%
- 1M
- 12.09%
- YTD
- 12.81%
- 6M
- 14.13%
- 1Y
- 91.26%
- 3Y*
- 25.51%
- 5Y*
- 15.97%
- 10Y*
- 11.95%
EWO
- 1D
- -1.79%
- 1M
- 5.62%
- YTD
- 14.52%
- 6M
- 21.29%
- 1Y
- 43.71%
- 3Y*
- 33.18%
- 5Y*
- 14.75%
- 10Y*
- 14.00%
CHRW vs. EWO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHRW C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. | 12.81% | 59.01% | 22.89% | -3.10% | -13.09% | 17.22% | 22.95% | -4.71% | -3.63% | 24.56% |
EWO iShares MSCI Austria ETF | 14.52% | 74.21% | 4.05% | 20.63% | -21.95% | 31.50% | -3.67% | 17.05% | -22.88% | 52.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between CHRW and EWO is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 1997 | 0.30 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CHRW vs. EWO — Risk / Return Rank
CHRW
EWO
CHRW vs. EWO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. (CHRW) and iShares MSCI Austria ETF (EWO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CHRW | EWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.40 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.57 | 3.12 | +1.45 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.08 | 10.58 | +1.49 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CHRW | EWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.19 | 2.38 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | 0.68 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 | 0.61 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.27 | +0.18 |
Drawdowns
CHRW vs. EWO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CHRW drawdown since its inception was -44.54%, smaller than the maximum EWO drawdown of -75.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHRW and EWO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CHRW | EWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.54% | -75.69% | +31.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.07% | -14.08% | -5.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.86% | -16.75% | -14.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.55% | -41.82% | +1.27% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.55% | -58.10% | +17.55% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.59% | -1.79% | -7.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.09% | -28.12% | +16.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.58% | 4.14% | +3.44% |
Volatility
CHRW vs. EWO - Volatility Comparison
C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. (CHRW) has a higher volatility of 9.36% compared to iShares MSCI Austria ETF (EWO) at 6.71%. This indicates that CHRW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EWO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CHRW | EWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.36% | 6.71% | +2.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.76% | 15.08% | +14.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 41.94% | 18.52% | +23.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.34% | 21.84% | +10.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.84% | 22.86% | +5.98% |
Dividends
CHRW vs. EWO - Dividend Comparison
CHRW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.38%, less than EWO's 2.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHRW C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. | 1.38% | 1.55% | 2.38% | 2.82% | 2.47% | 1.93% | 2.17% | 2.57% | 2.24% | 2.03% | 2.38% | 2.53% |
EWO iShares MSCI Austria ETF | 2.08% | 2.38% | 7.40% | 5.66% | 4.75% | 2.42% | 0.98% | 3.11% | 4.04% | 2.03% | 1.99% | 1.51% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CHRW and EWO have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CHRW has higher volatility (9.36%) compared to EWO (6.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CHRW dropped -44.54% vs EWO's -75.69%.
EWO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 2.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CHRW and EWO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer