CHRW vs. UPS

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. (CHRW) and United Parcel Service, Inc. (UPS).

Performance

CHRW vs. UPS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. (CHRW) and United Parcel Service, Inc. (UPS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CHRW vs. UPS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CHRW C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.	3.66%	59.01%	22.89%	-3.10%	-13.09%	17.22%	22.95%	-4.71%	-3.63%	24.56%
UPS United Parcel Service, Inc.	0.57%	-15.93%	-15.93%	-5.96%	-16.21%	30.02%	48.64%	24.24%	-15.48%	7.14%

Fundamentals

Market Cap CHRW : $20.20B UPS : $83.92B
EPS CHRW : $4.83 UPS : $6.56
PE Ratio CHRW : 34.37 UPS : 15.00
PS Ratio CHRW : 1.24 UPS : 0.94
PB Ratio CHRW : 10.95 UPS : 5.17
Total Revenue (TTM) CHRW : $16.23B UPS : $88.60B
Gross Profit (TTM) CHRW : $1.04B UPS : $35.39B
EBITDA (TTM) CHRW : $950.23M UPS : $10.89B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CHRW achieves a 3.66% return, which is significantly higher than UPS's 0.57% return. Over the past 10 years, CHRW has outperformed UPS with an annualized return of 11.03%, while UPS has yielded a comparatively lower 3.12% annualized return.

CHRW

• 1D: 2.56%
• 1M: -10.05%
• YTD: 3.66%
• 6M: 26.36%
• 1Y: 65.25%
• 3Y*: 21.58%
• 5Y*: 13.95%
• 10Y*: 11.03%

UPS

• 1D: 3.61%
• 1M: -15.16%
• YTD: 0.57%
• 6M: 21.50%
• 1Y: -4.44%
• 3Y*: -15.95%
• 5Y*: -6.58%
• 10Y*: 3.12%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

CHRW vs. UPS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CHRW

CHRW Risk / Return Rank: 88
CHRW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
CHRW Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
CHRW Omega Ratio Rank: 89
CHRW Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
CHRW Martin Ratio Rank: 89

UPS

UPS Risk / Return Rank: 34
UPS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
UPS Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
UPS Omega Ratio Rank: 31
UPS Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
UPS Martin Ratio Rank: 37

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CHRW vs. UPS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. (CHRW) and United Parcel Service, Inc. (UPS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CHRW	UPS	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.59	-0.15	+1.73
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.49	0.01	+2.48
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.00	+0.37
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.51	-0.19	+3.70
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	9.67	-0.32	+9.99
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CHRW vs. UPS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CHRW Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is higher than the UPS Sharpe Ratio of -0.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CHRW and UPS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CHRW	UPS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.59	-0.15	+1.73
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.44	-0.23	+0.68
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.39	0.12	+0.27
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.45	0.17	+0.28

Correlation

The correlation between CHRW and UPS is 0.53, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

CHRW vs. UPS - Dividend Comparison

CHRW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.51%, less than UPS's 6.67% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CHRW C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.	1.51%	1.55%	2.38%	2.82%	2.47%	1.93%	2.17%	2.57%	2.24%	2.03%	2.38%	2.53%
UPS United Parcel Service, Inc.	6.67%	6.61%	5.17%	4.12%	3.50%	1.90%	2.40%	3.28%	3.73%	2.79%	2.72%	3.03%

Drawdowns

CHRW vs. UPS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CHRW drawdown since its inception was -44.54%, smaller than the maximum UPS drawdown of -57.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHRW and UPS.

Drawdown Indicators

	CHRW	UPS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-44.54%	-57.92%	+13.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.18%	-22.39%	+3.21%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-40.55%	-57.92%	+17.37%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-40.55%	-57.92%	+17.37%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-16.93%	-48.28%	+31.35%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.08%	-15.10%	+3.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.97%	12.82%	-5.85%

Volatility

CHRW vs. UPS - Volatility Comparison

C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. (CHRW) and United Parcel Service, Inc. (UPS) have volatilities of 9.46% and 9.04%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CHRW	UPS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.46%	9.04%	+0.42%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	31.42%	19.55%	+11.87%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	41.32%	30.56%	+10.76%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	31.67%	28.26%	+3.41%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	28.42%	27.18%	+1.24%

Financials

CHRW vs. UPS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. and United Parcel Service, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

CHRW - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 3.91B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

UPS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, United Parcel Service, Inc. reported a gross profit of 24.48B and revenue of 24.48B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.

CHRW - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. reported an operating income of 181.35M and revenue of 3.91B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.6%.

UPS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, United Parcel Service, Inc. reported an operating income of 2.58B and revenue of 24.48B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.5%.

CHRW - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. reported a net income of 136.32M and revenue of 3.91B, resulting in a net margin of 3.5%.

UPS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, United Parcel Service, Inc. reported a net income of 1.79B and revenue of 24.48B, resulting in a net margin of 7.3%.