PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CHRW vs. EXPD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CHRW vs. EXPD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. (CHRW) and Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. (EXPD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CHRW achieves a 17.16% return, which is significantly higher than EXPD's 10.05% return. Over the past 10 years, CHRW has underperformed EXPD with an annualized return of 12.65%, while EXPD has yielded a comparatively higher 14.53% annualized return.


CHRW

1D
1.10%
1M
7.74%
YTD
17.16%
6M
14.16%
1Y
105.15%
3Y*
30.40%
5Y*
17.34%
10Y*
12.65%

EXPD

1D
1.13%
1M
3.48%
YTD
10.05%
6M
7.17%
1Y
45.08%
3Y*
13.87%
5Y*
6.67%
10Y*
14.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CHRW vs. EXPD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CHRW
C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.
17.16%59.01%22.89%-3.10%-13.09%17.22%22.95%-4.71%-3.63%24.56%
EXPD
Expeditors International of Washington, Inc.
10.05%36.16%-11.86%23.86%-21.68%42.50%23.47%16.17%6.52%23.93%

Correlation

The correlation between CHRW and EXPD is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 16, 1997

0.58

The correlation between CHRW and EXPD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CHRW:

$22.64B

EXPD:

$21.87B

EPS

CHRW:

$4.93

EXPD:

$6.16

PE Ratio

CHRW:

37.91

EXPD:

26.47

PS Ratio

CHRW:

1.40

EXPD:

1.98

PB Ratio

CHRW:

13.28

EXPD:

9.58

Total Revenue (TTM)

CHRW:

$16.20B

EXPD:

$11.19B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CHRW:

$1.03B

EXPD:

$1.29B

EBITDA (TTM)

CHRW:

$948.77M

EXPD:

$1.18B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CHRW vs. EXPD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CHRW
CHRW Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
CHRW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHRW Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHRW Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
CHRW Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHRW Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

EXPD
EXPD Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
EXPD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EXPD Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
EXPD Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
EXPD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
EXPD Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CHRW vs. EXPD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. (CHRW) and Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. (EXPD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CHRWEXPDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.31

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.27

2.85

+2.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.75

7.21

+6.54

CHRW vs. EXPD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CHRW Sharpe Ratio is 2.50, which is higher than the EXPD Sharpe Ratio of 1.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CHRW and EXPD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CHRW vs. EXPD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CHRW drawdown since its inception was -44.54%, smaller than the maximum EXPD drawdown of -58.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHRW and EXPD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CHRWEXPDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.54%

-58.07%

+13.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.07%

-15.88%

-4.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.86%

-21.26%

-9.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.55%

-35.62%

-4.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.55%

-35.62%

-4.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.10%

-2.08%

-4.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.08%

-13.62%

+1.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.67%

6.27%

+1.40%

Volatility

CHRW vs. EXPD - Volatility Comparison

C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. (CHRW) has a higher volatility of 8.25% compared to Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. (EXPD) at 5.70%. This indicates that CHRW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EXPD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CHRWEXPDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.25%

5.70%

+2.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.09%

24.25%

+5.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

42.44%

30.58%

+11.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.41%

26.80%

+5.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.92%

25.12%

+3.80%

Dividends

CHRW vs. EXPD - Dividend Comparison

CHRW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.34%, more than EXPD's 0.97% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CHRW
C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.
1.34%1.55%2.38%2.82%2.47%1.93%2.17%2.57%2.24%2.03%2.38%2.53%
EXPD
Expeditors International of Washington, Inc.
0.97%1.03%1.32%1.08%1.29%0.86%1.09%1.28%1.32%1.30%1.51%1.60%

Financials

CHRW vs. EXPD - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. and Expeditors International of Washington, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B7.00B20222023202420252026
4.01B
2.78B
(CHRW) Total Revenue
(EXPD) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CHRW vs. EXPD - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. and Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%5.0%10.0%15.0%2022202320242025202600
Portfolio components
CHRW - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 4.01B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

EXPD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 2.78B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

CHRW - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. reported an operating income of 175.69M and revenue of 4.01B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.4%.

EXPD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. reported an operating income of 294.83M and revenue of 2.78B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.6%.

CHRW - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. reported a net income of 147.23M and revenue of 4.01B, resulting in a net margin of 3.7%.

EXPD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. reported a net income of 229.61M and revenue of 2.78B, resulting in a net margin of 8.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CHRW and EXPD have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CHRW has higher volatility (8.25%) compared to EXPD (5.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CHRW dropped -44.54% vs EXPD's -58.07%.

CHRW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CHRW and EXPD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer