CHRW vs. EXPD
CHRW (C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.) and EXPD (Expeditors International of Washington, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Integrated Freight & Logistics industry within the Industrials sector. Over the past 10 years, CHRW returned 10.53%/yr vs 13.98%/yr for EXPD. Their 0.58 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently.
Performance
CHRW vs. EXPD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CHRW achieves a -7.48% return, which is significantly lower than EXPD's 13.25% return. Over the past 10 years, CHRW has underperformed EXPD with an annualized return of 10.53%, while EXPD has yielded a comparatively higher 13.98% annualized return.
CHRW
- 1D
- 0.55%
- 1M
- -22.19%
- 6M
- -23.70%
- YTD
- -7.48%
- 1Y
- 31.80%
- 3Y*
- 16.80%
- 5Y*
- 13.19%
- 10Y*
- 10.53%
- ALL TIME*
- 13.99%
EXPD
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- 0.19%
- 6M
- 5.12%
- YTD
- 13.25%
- 1Y
- 47.97%
- 3Y*
- 11.49%
- 5Y*
- 6.76%
- 10Y*
- 13.98%
- ALL TIME*
- 16.89%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $526.07M | $418.85M | $344.02M | |
| $190.53M | $212.72M | $207.16M |
CHRW vs. EXPD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHRW C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. | -7.48% | 59.01% | 22.89% | -3.10% | -13.09% | 17.22% | 22.95% | -4.71% | -3.63% | 24.56% |
EXPD Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. | 13.25% | 36.16% | -11.86% | 23.86% | -21.68% | 42.50% | 23.47% | 16.17% | 6.52% | 23.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between CHRW and EXPD is 0.63, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.63 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.59 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.61 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 16, 1997 | 0.58 |
The correlation between CHRW and EXPD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.
Fundamentals
CHRW:
$17.41B
EXPD:
$21.96B
CHRW:
$5.23
EXPD:
$6.19
CHRW:
28.25
EXPD:
27.12
CHRW:
1.05
EXPD:
2.03
CHRW:
10.92
EXPD:
9.85
CHRW:
$17.00B
EXPD:
$11.19B
CHRW:
$676.81M
EXPD:
$1.29B
CHRW:
$909.95M
EXPD:
$1.18B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CHRW vs. EXPD — Risk / Return Rank
CHRW
EXPD
CHRW vs. EXPD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. (CHRW) and Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. (EXPD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CHRW | EXPD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.83 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.88 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.32 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.01 | 2.91 | -1.89 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.56 | 7.32 | -3.76 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CHRW vs. EXPD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CHRW drawdown since its inception was -44.54%, smaller than the maximum EXPD drawdown of -58.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHRW and EXPD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CHRW | EXPD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.54% | -58.07% | +13.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.84% | -15.88% | -13.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.59% | -21.26% | -9.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.55% | -35.62% | -4.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.55% | -35.62% | -4.93% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -29.46% | -8.16% | -21.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.06% | -13.59% | +1.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.49% | 6.29% | +2.20% |
Volatility
CHRW vs. EXPD - Volatility Comparison
C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. (CHRW) has a higher volatility of 21.50% compared to Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. (EXPD) at 7.19%. This indicates that CHRW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EXPD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CHRW | EXPD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 21.50% | 7.19% | +14.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.66% | 24.78% | +11.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.91% | 30.54% | +16.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.69% | 26.91% | +6.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.60% | 25.17% | +4.43% |
Dividends
CHRW vs. EXPD - Dividend Comparison
CHRW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.70%, more than EXPD's 0.94% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHRW C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. | 1.70% | 1.55% | 2.38% | 2.82% | 2.47% | 1.93% | 2.17% | 2.57% | 2.24% | 2.03% | 2.38% | 2.53% |
EXPD Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. | 0.94% | 1.03% | 1.32% | 1.08% | 1.29% | 0.86% | 1.09% | 1.28% | 1.32% | 1.30% | 1.51% | 1.60% |
Financials
CHRW vs. EXPD - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. and Expeditors International of Washington, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CHRW vs. EXPD - Profitability Comparison
CHRW - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. reported a gross profit of -307.77M and revenue of 4.93B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -6.2%.
EXPD - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 2.78B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
CHRW - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. reported an operating income of 255.74M and revenue of 4.93B, resulting in an operating margin of 5.2%.
EXPD - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. reported an operating income of 294.83M and revenue of 2.78B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.6%.
CHRW - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. reported a net income of 186.79M and revenue of 4.93B, resulting in a net margin of 3.8%.
EXPD - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. reported a net income of 229.61M and revenue of 2.78B, resulting in a net margin of 8.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CHRW and EXPD have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CHRW has higher volatility (21.50%) compared to EXPD (7.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CHRW dropped -44.54% vs EXPD's -58.07%.
EXPD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.53 vs 0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CHRW and EXPD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer