CHRS vs. CIFR
CHRS (Coherus BioSciences, Inc.) and CIFR (Cipher Mining Inc.) are both stocks. CHRS operates in Biotechnology (Healthcare), while CIFR operates in Capital Markets (Financial Services). Over the past 3 years, CHRS returned -30.87%/yr vs 116.66%/yr for CIFR. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CHRS vs. CIFR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CHRS achieves a 3.52% return, which is significantly lower than CIFR's 77.78% return.
CHRS
- 1D
- -3.29%
- 1M
- -15.03%
- YTD
- 3.52%
- 6M
- 20.49%
- 1Y
- 87.98%
- 3Y*
- -30.87%
- 5Y*
- -35.60%
- 10Y*
- -22.28%
CIFR
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- 46.67%
- YTD
- 77.78%
- 6M
- 40.85%
- 1Y
- 663.90%
- 3Y*
- 116.66%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CHRS vs. CIFR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHRS Coherus BioSciences, Inc. | 3.52% | 2.90% | -58.56% | -57.95% | -50.38% | 0.76% |
CIFR Cipher Mining Inc. | 77.78% | 218.10% | 12.35% | 637.50% | -87.90% | -54.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between CHRS and CIFR is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2021 | 0.28 |
Fundamentals
CHRS:
$200.51M
CIFR:
$10.63B
CHRS:
$1.52
CIFR:
-$2.33
CHRS:
3.83
CIFR:
57.66
CHRS:
2.55
CIFR:
14.88
CHRS:
$46.88M
CIFR:
$174.98M
CHRS:
$23.41M
CIFR:
-$172.84M
CHRS:
-$162.15M
CIFR:
-$169.22M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CHRS vs. CIFR — Risk / Return Rank
CHRS
CIFR
CHRS vs. CIFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Coherus BioSciences, Inc. (CHRS) and Cipher Mining Inc. (CIFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CHRS | CIFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.09 | 6.19 | -5.10 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.85 | 4.23 | -2.38 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.49 | -0.27 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.13 | 13.04 | -10.91 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.95 | 26.19 | -22.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CHRS | CIFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.09 | 6.19 | -5.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.42 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.30 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.23 | 0.18 | -0.41 |
Drawdowns
CHRS vs. CIFR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CHRS drawdown since its inception was -98.21%, roughly equal to the maximum CIFR drawdown of -97.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHRS and CIFR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CHRS | CIFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.21% | -97.16% | -1.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -41.43% | -51.38% | +9.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -87.71% | -71.74% | -15.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -96.47% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -97.88% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -96.08% | -0.19% | -95.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -63.48% | -66.62% | +3.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 22.36% | 25.53% | -3.17% |
Volatility
CHRS vs. CIFR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Coherus BioSciences, Inc. (CHRS) is 21.11%, while Cipher Mining Inc. (CIFR) has a volatility of 31.03%. This indicates that CHRS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CIFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CHRS | CIFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 21.11% | 31.03% | -9.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 60.22% | 70.59% | -10.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 81.15% | 108.31% | -27.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 84.64% | 121.98% | -37.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 74.90% | 121.98% | -47.08% |
Dividends
CHRS vs. CIFR - Dividend Comparison
Neither CHRS nor CIFR has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
CHRS vs. CIFR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Coherus BioSciences, Inc. and Cipher Mining Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
CHRS and CIFR have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CIFR has higher volatility (31.03%) compared to CHRS (21.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CHRS dropped -98.21% vs CIFR's -97.16%.
CIFR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.19 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CHRS and CIFR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer