PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CHRS vs. ATS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CHRS vs. ATS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Coherus BioSciences, Inc. (CHRS) and ATS Corporation (ATS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CHRS achieves a 3.52% return, which is significantly lower than ATS's 4.76% return. Over the past 10 years, CHRS has underperformed ATS with an annualized return of -22.28%, while ATS has yielded a comparatively higher 13.52% annualized return.


CHRS

1D
-3.29%
1M
-15.03%
YTD
3.52%
6M
20.49%
1Y
87.98%
3Y*
-30.87%
5Y*
-35.60%
10Y*
-22.28%

ATS

1D
-3.38%
1M
-10.15%
YTD
4.76%
6M
12.48%
1Y
-2.99%
3Y*
-13.66%
5Y*
2.54%
10Y*
13.52%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CHRS vs. ATS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CHRS
Coherus BioSciences, Inc.
3.52%2.90%-58.56%-57.95%-50.38%-8.17%-3.47%98.95%2.84%-68.74%
ATS
ATS Corporation
4.76%-9.65%-29.23%39.27%-22.16%128.07%5.58%55.37%-10.46%27.39%

Correlation

The correlation between CHRS and ATS is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.17

The correlation between CHRS and ATS shifts across timeframes, from 0.17 (10 years) to 0.33 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

CHRS:

$1.52

ATS:

$0.97

PE Ratio

CHRS:

0.96

ATS:

29.67

PS Ratio

CHRS:

3.83

ATS:

0.71

Total Revenue (TTM)

CHRS:

$46.88M

ATS:

$2.97B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CHRS:

$23.41M

ATS:

$850.80M

EBITDA (TTM)

CHRS:

-$162.15M

ATS:

$357.63M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CHRS vs. ATS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CHRS
CHRS Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
CHRS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHRS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHRS Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
CHRS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHRS Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

ATS
ATS Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
ATS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ATS Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
ATS Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
ATS Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
ATS Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CHRS vs. ATS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Coherus BioSciences, Inc. (CHRS) and ATS Corporation (ATS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CHRSATSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.02

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.13

-0.12

+2.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.95

-0.23

+4.18

CHRS vs. ATS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CHRS Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is higher than the ATS Sharpe Ratio of -0.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CHRS and ATS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CHRSATSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.09

-0.07

+1.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.42

0.06

-0.49

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.30

0.37

-0.67

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.23

0.35

-0.58

Drawdowns

CHRS vs. ATS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CHRS drawdown since its inception was -98.21%, which is greater than ATS's maximum drawdown of -56.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHRS and ATS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CHRSATSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.21%

-56.76%

-41.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-41.43%

-25.80%

-15.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-87.71%

-56.76%

-30.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-96.47%

-56.76%

-39.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-97.88%

-56.76%

-41.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-96.08%

-40.80%

-55.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-63.48%

-19.90%

-43.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

22.36%

12.78%

+9.58%

Volatility

CHRS vs. ATS - Volatility Comparison

Coherus BioSciences, Inc. (CHRS) has a higher volatility of 21.11% compared to ATS Corporation (ATS) at 19.42%. This indicates that CHRS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ATS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CHRSATSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

21.11%

19.42%

+1.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

60.22%

32.82%

+27.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

81.15%

40.56%

+40.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

84.64%

40.36%

+44.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

74.90%

38.64%

+36.26%

Dividends

CHRS vs. ATS - Dividend Comparison

Neither CHRS nor ATS has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

CHRS vs. ATS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Coherus BioSciences, Inc. and ATS Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M20222023202420252026
12.31M
747.10M
(CHRS) Total Revenue
(ATS) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


CHRS and ATS have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CHRS has higher volatility (21.11%) compared to ATS (19.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CHRS dropped -98.21% vs ATS's -56.76%.

CHRS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.09 vs -0.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CHRS and ATS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer