CHRS vs. TSLY
CHRS (Coherus BioSciences, Inc.) is a stock, while TSLY (YieldMax TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF) is Options Trading fund actively managed by YieldMax. Over the past 3 years, CHRS returned -30.87%/yr vs 15.16%/yr for TSLY. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CHRS vs. TSLY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CHRS achieves a 3.52% return, which is significantly higher than TSLY's -1.68% return.
CHRS
- 1D
- -3.29%
- 1M
- -15.03%
- YTD
- 3.52%
- 6M
- 20.49%
- 1Y
- 87.98%
- 3Y*
- -30.87%
- 5Y*
- -35.60%
- 10Y*
- -22.28%
TSLY
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 5.56%
- YTD
- -1.68%
- 6M
- -1.00%
- 1Y
- 24.54%
- 3Y*
- 15.16%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CHRS vs. TSLY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHRS Coherus BioSciences, Inc. | 3.52% | 2.90% | -58.56% | -57.95% | 20.92% |
TSLY YieldMax TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF | -1.68% | 13.62% | 27.83% | 50.69% | -27.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between CHRS and TSLY is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 25, 2022 | 0.23 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CHRS vs. TSLY — Risk / Return Rank
CHRS
TSLY
CHRS vs. TSLY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Coherus BioSciences, Inc. (CHRS) and YieldMax TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (TSLY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CHRS | TSLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.09 | 0.65 | +0.44 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.85 | 1.05 | +0.79 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.14 | +0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.13 | 1.14 | +1.00 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.95 | 2.75 | +1.19 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CHRS | TSLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.09 | 0.65 | +0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.42 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.30 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.23 | 0.30 | -0.53 |
Drawdowns
CHRS vs. TSLY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CHRS drawdown since its inception was -98.21%, which is greater than TSLY's maximum drawdown of -49.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHRS and TSLY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CHRS | TSLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.21% | -49.52% | -48.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -41.43% | -21.64% | -19.79% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -87.71% | -49.52% | -38.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -96.47% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -97.88% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -96.08% | -8.07% | -88.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -63.48% | -20.00% | -43.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 22.36% | 9.10% | +13.26% |
Volatility
CHRS vs. TSLY - Volatility Comparison
Coherus BioSciences, Inc. (CHRS) has a higher volatility of 21.11% compared to YieldMax TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (TSLY) at 9.96%. This indicates that CHRS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TSLY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CHRS | TSLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 21.11% | 9.96% | +11.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 60.22% | 22.37% | +37.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 81.15% | 38.18% | +42.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 84.64% | 45.50% | +39.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 74.90% | 45.50% | +29.40% |
Dividends
CHRS vs. TSLY - Dividend Comparison
CHRS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TSLY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 83.79%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CHRS Coherus BioSciences, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TSLY YieldMax TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF | 83.79% | 91.19% | 82.30% | 76.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CHRS and TSLY have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CHRS has higher volatility (21.11%) compared to TSLY (9.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CHRS dropped -98.21% vs TSLY's -49.52%.
CHRS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.09 vs 0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CHRS and TSLY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer