PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CHRG.L vs. AMPS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CHRG.L vs. AMPS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in WisdomTree Battery Solutions UCITS ETF - USD Acc (CHRG.L) and WisdomTree Battery Metals (AMPS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CHRG.L achieves a 23.07% return, which is significantly higher than AMPS.L's 6.73% return.


CHRG.L

1D
-1.36%
1M
-9.26%
YTD
23.07%
6M
21.43%
1Y
83.63%
3Y*
12.82%
5Y*
3.81%
10Y*

AMPS.L

1D
-2.08%
1M
-6.71%
YTD
6.73%
6M
9.06%
1Y
23.56%
3Y*
3.42%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CHRG.L vs. AMPS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
CHRG.L
WisdomTree Battery Solutions UCITS ETF - USD Acc
23.07%44.29%-11.91%-9.67%-11.41%
AMPS.L
WisdomTree Battery Metals
6.73%9.11%0.72%-28.10%-10.28%

Correlation

The correlation between CHRG.L and AMPS.L is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 20, 2022

0.33

The correlation between CHRG.L and AMPS.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.33 (all time) to 0.43 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CHRG.L vs. AMPS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CHRG.L
CHRG.L Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
CHRG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHRG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHRG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
CHRG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHRG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

AMPS.L
AMPS.L Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
AMPS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMPS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMPS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
AMPS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMPS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CHRG.L vs. AMPS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Battery Solutions UCITS ETF - USD Acc (CHRG.L) and WisdomTree Battery Metals (AMPS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CHRG.LAMPS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.28

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.23

2.55

+3.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.20

6.84

+11.36

CHRG.L vs. AMPS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CHRG.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.94, which is higher than the AMPS.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CHRG.L and AMPS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CHRG.L vs. AMPS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CHRG.L drawdown since its inception was -52.64%, which is greater than AMPS.L's maximum drawdown of -40.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHRG.L and AMPS.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CHRG.LAMPS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.64%

-40.55%

-12.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.35%

-9.19%

-4.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-39.93%

-23.44%

-16.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-52.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.10%

-24.97%

+13.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.14%

-29.45%

+8.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.58%

3.43%

+1.15%

Volatility

CHRG.L vs. AMPS.L - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Battery Solutions UCITS ETF - USD Acc (CHRG.L) has a higher volatility of 8.69% compared to WisdomTree Battery Metals (AMPS.L) at 5.29%. This indicates that CHRG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMPS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CHRG.LAMPS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.69%

5.29%

+3.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.12%

12.44%

+7.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.36%

15.91%

+12.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.21%

19.34%

+6.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3,147.98%

19.34%

+3,128.64%

CHRG.L vs. AMPS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

CHRG.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than AMPS.L's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

CHRG.L vs. AMPS.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither CHRG.L nor AMPS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


CHRG.L and AMPS.L have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CHRG.L is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CHRG.L is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for AMPS.L.

CHRG.L tracks WisdomTree Battery Solutions Index, while AMPS.L tracks WisdomTree Battery Metals Commodity. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for CHRG.L and 0.45% for AMPS.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CHRG.L and AMPS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer