CHRG.L vs. EEWD.L
CHRG.L (WisdomTree Battery Solutions UCITS ETF - USD Acc) and EEWD.L (iShares MSCI World ESG Enhanced CTB UCITS ETF USD Inc) are both exchange-traded funds - CHRG.L is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree Battery Solutions Index, while EEWD.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI World ESG Enhanced Focus CTB Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CHRG.L returned 6.01%/yr vs 11.70%/yr for EEWD.L. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CHRG.L charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for EEWD.L.
Performance
CHRG.L vs. EEWD.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
CHRG.L is traded in GBp, while EEWD.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the EEWD.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CHRG.L achieves a 34.75% return, which is significantly higher than EEWD.L's 9.59% return.
CHRG.L
- 1D
- -1.90%
- 1M
- 6.41%
- YTD
- 34.75%
- 6M
- 34.20%
- 1Y
- 109.23%
- 3Y*
- 14.83%
- 5Y*
- 6.01%
- 10Y*
- —
EEWD.L
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- 5.06%
- YTD
- 9.59%
- 6M
- 10.07%
- 1Y
- 25.70%
- 3Y*
- 16.53%
- 5Y*
- 11.70%
- 10Y*
- —
CHRG.L vs. EEWD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHRG.L WisdomTree Battery Solutions UCITS ETF - USD Acc | 34.75% | 44.29% | -11.91% | -9.67% | -19.10% | 14.89% | 72.90% |
EEWD.L iShares MSCI World ESG Enhanced CTB UCITS ETF USD Inc | 9.59% | 10.73% | 20.42% | 17.01% | -10.74% | 23.86% | 17.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between CHRG.L and EEWD.L is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 2020 | 0.60 |
The correlation between CHRG.L and EEWD.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.
CHRG.L vs. EEWD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CHRG.L
EEWD.L
Industrials
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Energy
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Industrials
CHRG.L
EEWD.L
Basic Materials
CHRG.L
EEWD.L
Consumer Cyclical
CHRG.L
EEWD.L
Technology
CHRG.L
EEWD.L
Energy
CHRG.L
EEWD.L
Utilities
CHRG.L
EEWD.L
Consumer Defensive
CHRG.L
EEWD.L
Communication Services
CHRG.L
-
EEWD.L
Financial Services
CHRG.L
-
EEWD.L
Healthcare
CHRG.L
-
EEWD.L
Real Estate
CHRG.L
-
EEWD.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CHRG.L vs. EEWD.L — Risk / Return Rank
CHRG.L
EEWD.L
CHRG.L vs. EEWD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Battery Solutions UCITS ETF - USD Acc (CHRG.L) and iShares MSCI World ESG Enhanced CTB UCITS ETF USD Inc (EEWD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CHRG.L | EEWD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.55 | 1.40 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.66 | 3.69 | -0.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.77 | 14.05 | -7.28 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CHRG.L | EEWD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.08 | 2.18 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 | 0.80 | -0.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 0.82 | -0.29 |
Drawdowns
CHRG.L vs. EEWD.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CHRG.L drawdown since its inception was -52.64%, which is greater than EEWD.L's maximum drawdown of -25.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHRG.L and EEWD.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CHRG.L | EEWD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.64% | -25.51% | -27.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.68% | -6.94% | -22.74% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -39.46% | -19.04% | -20.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -52.64% | -19.04% | -33.60% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.67% | -0.22% | -2.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.35% | -3.81% | -18.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.07% | 1.82% | +14.25% |
Volatility
CHRG.L vs. EEWD.L - Volatility Comparison
WisdomTree Battery Solutions UCITS ETF - USD Acc (CHRG.L) has a higher volatility of 10.38% compared to iShares MSCI World ESG Enhanced CTB UCITS ETF USD Inc (EEWD.L) at 3.51%. This indicates that CHRG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EEWD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CHRG.L | EEWD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.38% | 3.51% | +6.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.04% | 8.96% | +10.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 52.32% | 11.78% | +40.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.08% | 14.62% | +15.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.55% | 16.28% | +13.27% |
CHRG.L vs. EEWD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
CHRG.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than EEWD.L's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
CHRG.L vs. EEWD.L - Dividend Comparison
CHRG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EEWD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.09%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHRG.L WisdomTree Battery Solutions UCITS ETF - USD Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EEWD.L iShares MSCI World ESG Enhanced CTB UCITS ETF USD Inc | 1.09% | 1.19% | 1.39% | 1.59% | 1.82% | 1.29% | 1.35% | 1.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CHRG.L and EEWD.L have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EEWD.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EEWD.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for CHRG.L.
CHRG.L is categorized as Alternative Energy Equities, while EEWD.L is Global Equities. CHRG.L tracks WisdomTree Battery Solutions Index, while EEWD.L tracks MSCI World ESG Enhanced Focus CTB Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for CHRG.L and 0.20% for EEWD.L.
Find the right allocation for CHRG.L and EEWD.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer