CHRG.L vs. BATT.L

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CHRG.L (WisdomTree Battery Solutions UCITS ETF - USD Acc) and BATT.L (L&G Battery Value-Chain UCITS ETF) are both Alternative Energy Equities funds - CHRG.L tracks the WisdomTree Battery Solutions Index while BATT.L tracks the Solactive Battery Value-Chain Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CHRG.L returned 6.01%/yr vs 18.04%/yr for BATT.L. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CHRG.L charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for BATT.L.

Performance

CHRG.L vs. BATT.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in WisdomTree Battery Solutions UCITS ETF - USD Acc (CHRG.L) and L&G Battery Value-Chain UCITS ETF (BATT.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

CHRG.L is traded in GBp, while BATT.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the BATT.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CHRG.L achieves a 34.75% return, which is significantly lower than BATT.L's 39.22% return.

CHRG.L

• 1D: -1.90%
• 1M: 6.41%
• YTD: 34.75%
• 6M: 34.20%
• 1Y: 109.23%
• 3Y*: 14.83%
• 5Y*: 6.01%
• 10Y*: —

BATT.L

• 1D: -1.11%
• 1M: 3.24%
• YTD: 39.22%
• 6M: 44.29%
• 1Y: 137.34%
• 3Y*: 26.20%
• 5Y*: 18.04%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CHRG.L vs. BATT.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
CHRG.L WisdomTree Battery Solutions UCITS ETF - USD Acc	34.75%	44.29%	-11.91%	-9.67%	-19.10%	14.89%	72.90%
BATT.L L&G Battery Value-Chain UCITS ETF	39.22%	59.22%	0.53%	3.36%	-3.98%	16.77%	76.13%

Correlation

The correlation between CHRG.L and BATT.L is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.79
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.78
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.78
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 2020	0.77

The correlation between CHRG.L and BATT.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

CHRG.L vs. BATT.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CHRG.L	BATT.L
Industrials	48.7%	33.3%
Basic Materials	20.3%	36.9%
Consumer Cyclical	15.5%	15.0%
Technology	8.2%	11.8%
Energy	6.1%	-
Utilities	1.3%	3.0%
Consumer Defensive	0.0%	-
Communication Services	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

CHRG.L vs. BATT.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CHRG.L

CHRG.L Risk / Return Rank: 66
CHRG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
CHRG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
CHRG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 88
CHRG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
CHRG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 42

BATT.L

BATT.L Risk / Return Rank: 95
BATT.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
BATT.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
BATT.L Omega Ratio Rank: 93
BATT.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
BATT.L Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CHRG.L vs. BATT.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Battery Solutions UCITS ETF - USD Acc (CHRG.L) and L&G Battery Value-Chain UCITS ETF (BATT.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CHRG.L	BATT.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.08	4.74	-2.66
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.86	5.06	-2.20
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.55	1.68	-0.13
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.66	10.57	-6.91
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.77	36.77	-30.00
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CHRG.L vs. BATT.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CHRG.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.08, which is lower than the BATT.L Sharpe Ratio of 4.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CHRG.L and BATT.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CHRG.L	BATT.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.08	4.74	-2.66
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.20	0.77	-0.57
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.53	0.80	-0.27

Drawdowns

CHRG.L vs. BATT.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CHRG.L drawdown since its inception was -52.64%, which is greater than BATT.L's maximum drawdown of -33.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHRG.L and BATT.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	CHRG.L	BATT.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-52.64%	-33.29%	-19.35%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-29.68%	-12.91%	-16.77%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-39.46%	-33.29%	-6.17%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-52.64%	-33.29%	-19.35%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.67%	-1.81%	-0.86%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-22.35%	-8.89%	-13.46%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	16.07%	3.72%	+12.35%

Volatility

CHRG.L vs. BATT.L - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Battery Solutions UCITS ETF - USD Acc (CHRG.L) and L&G Battery Value-Chain UCITS ETF (BATT.L) have volatilities of 10.38% and 10.66%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CHRG.L	BATT.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.38%	10.66%	-0.28%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.04%	22.85%	-3.81%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	52.32%	28.86%	+23.46%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	30.08%	23.58%	+6.50%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	29.55%	23.55%	+6.00%

CHRG.L vs. BATT.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

CHRG.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than BATT.L's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

CHRG.L vs. BATT.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither CHRG.L nor BATT.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CHRG.L and BATT.L in my portfolio?

CHRG.L and BATT.L have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CHRG.L or BATT.L?

On fees, CHRG.L is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CHRG.L or BATT.L?

CHRG.L is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for BATT.L.

What is the main difference between CHRG.L and BATT.L?

CHRG.L tracks WisdomTree Battery Solutions Index, while BATT.L tracks Solactive Battery Value-Chain Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Legal & General. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for CHRG.L and 0.49% for BATT.L.