AMPS.L vs. LIT
Compare and contrast key facts about WisdomTree Battery Metals (AMPS.L) and Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT).
AMPS.L and LIT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. AMPS.L is a passively managed fund by WisdomTree that tracks the performance of the WisdomTree Battery Metals Commodity. It was launched on Mar 3, 2022. LIT is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Solactive Global Lithium Index. It was launched on Jul 22, 2010. Both AMPS.L and LIT are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: AMPS.L or LIT.
Key characteristics
| AMPS.L | LIT | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 12.26% | -10.62% |
| 1Y Return | -2.42% | -24.28% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.05 | -0.90 |
| Daily Std Dev | 16.44% | 27.29% |
| Max Drawdown | -34.22% | -61.91% |
| Current Drawdown | -21.57% | -51.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMPS.L and LIT is 0.31, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
AMPS.L vs. LIT - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, AMPS.L achieves a 12.26% return, which is significantly higher than LIT's -10.62% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AMPS.L vs. LIT - Expense Ratio Comparison
AMPS.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than LIT's 0.75% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
AMPS.L vs. LIT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Battery Metals (AMPS.L) and Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
AMPS.L vs. LIT - Dividend Comparison
AMPS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.24%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMPS.L WisdomTree Battery Metals | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LIT Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF | 1.24% | 1.11% | 0.99% | 0.22% | 0.40% | 1.85% | 2.52% | 3.26% | 2.15% | 0.24% | 1.07% | 0.32% |
Drawdowns
AMPS.L vs. LIT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMPS.L drawdown since its inception was -34.22%, smaller than the maximum LIT drawdown of -61.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMPS.L and LIT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
AMPS.L vs. LIT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for WisdomTree Battery Metals (AMPS.L) is 6.71%, while Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT) has a volatility of 9.44%. This indicates that AMPS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.