PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMPS.L vs. NICK.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

AMPS.L vs. NICK.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in WisdomTree Battery Metals (AMPS.L) and WisdomTree Nickel (NICK.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

AMPS.L vs. NICK.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
AMPS.L
WisdomTree Battery Metals
6.40%9.11%0.72%-28.10%0.71%
NICK.L
WisdomTree Nickel
3.70%-1.30%-6.79%-49.33%10.49%
Different Trading Currencies

AMPS.L is traded in GBp, while NICK.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the NICK.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMPS.L achieves a 6.40% return, which is significantly higher than NICK.L's 3.70% return.


AMPS.L

1D
0.68%
1M
0.88%
YTD
6.40%
6M
17.71%
1Y
13.10%
3Y*
-1.10%
5Y*
10Y*

NICK.L

1D
-1.46%
1M
-1.99%
YTD
3.70%
6M
12.91%
1Y
2.63%
3Y*
-13.70%
5Y*
0.74%
10Y*
6.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


AMPS.L vs. NICK.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMPS.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than NICK.L's 0.49% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

AMPS.L vs. NICK.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMPS.L
AMPS.L Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
AMPS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMPS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMPS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
AMPS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMPS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

NICK.L
NICK.L Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
NICK.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NICK.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
NICK.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
NICK.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
NICK.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMPS.L vs. NICK.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Battery Metals (AMPS.L) and WisdomTree Nickel (NICK.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AMPS.LNICK.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.82

0.11

+0.71

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.18

0.36

+0.83

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.05

+0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.51

0.09

+1.42

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.87

0.15

+2.71

AMPS.L vs. NICK.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMPS.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.82, which is higher than the NICK.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMPS.L and NICK.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AMPS.LNICK.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

0.11

+0.71

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.22

-0.13

-0.09

Correlation

The correlation between AMPS.L and NICK.L is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

AMPS.L vs. NICK.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither AMPS.L nor NICK.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

AMPS.L vs. NICK.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMPS.L drawdown since its inception was -35.07%, smaller than the maximum NICK.L drawdown of -83.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMPS.L and NICK.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


AMPS.LNICK.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.07%

-87.80%

+52.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.81%

-12.99%

+3.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-71.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-71.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.31%

-76.63%

+58.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.09%

-70.06%

+45.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.70%

6.35%

-1.65%

Volatility

AMPS.L vs. NICK.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree Battery Metals (AMPS.L) is 4.82%, while WisdomTree Nickel (NICK.L) has a volatility of 5.95%. This indicates that AMPS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NICK.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


AMPS.LNICK.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.82%

5.95%

-1.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.73%

21.59%

-9.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.95%

24.75%

-8.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.73%

44.29%

-24.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.73%

36.71%

-16.98%