CHPY vs. QYLD

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CHPY (YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF) and QYLD (Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CHPY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax, while QYLD is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the CBOE NASDAQ-100 Buy Write V2. CHPY is actively managed, while QYLD is passively managed. Over the past year, CHPY returned 149.72% vs 23.93% for QYLD. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CHPY charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for QYLD.

Performance

CHPY vs. QYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF (CHPY) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CHPY achieves a 85.77% return, which is significantly higher than QYLD's 7.88% return.

CHPY

• 1D: 1.14%
• 1M: 29.53%
• YTD: 85.77%
• 6M: 85.49%
• 1Y: 149.72%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QYLD

• 1D: -0.06%
• 1M: 1.62%
• YTD: 7.88%
• 6M: 9.97%
• 1Y: 23.93%
• 3Y*: 13.80%
• 5Y*: 8.43%
• 10Y*: 9.80%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CHPY vs. QYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CHPY YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF	85.77%	62.91%
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF	7.88%	19.74%

Correlation

The correlation between CHPY and QYLD is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.69
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2025	0.70

The correlation between CHPY and QYLD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

CHPY vs. QYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CHPY

CHPY Risk / Return Rank: 97
CHPY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
CHPY Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
CHPY Omega Ratio Rank: 96
CHPY Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
CHPY Martin Ratio Rank: 97

QYLD

QYLD Risk / Return Rank: 88
QYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
QYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
QYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 92
QYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
QYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CHPY vs. QYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF (CHPY) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CHPY	QYLD	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	5.47	2.80	+2.67
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	5.76	3.92	+1.84
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.81	1.63	+0.18
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	12.38	4.84	+7.54
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	47.28	28.36	+18.92
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CHPY vs. QYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CHPY Sharpe Ratio is 5.47, which is higher than the QYLD Sharpe Ratio of 2.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CHPY and QYLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CHPY	QYLD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.47	2.80	+2.67
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.58	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.63	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	4.83	0.59	+4.24

Drawdowns

CHPY vs. QYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CHPY drawdown since its inception was -12.17%, smaller than the maximum QYLD drawdown of -24.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHPY and QYLD.

Drawdown Indicators

	CHPY	QYLD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.17%	-24.75%	+12.58%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.17%	-4.97%	-7.20%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-19.06%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-24.61%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-24.75%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.06%	+0.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.98%	-3.84%	+1.86%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.18%	0.85%	+2.33%

Volatility

CHPY vs. QYLD - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF (CHPY) has a higher volatility of 11.23% compared to Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) at 1.85%. This indicates that CHPY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CHPY	QYLD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.23%	1.85%	+9.38%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.33%	7.12%	+15.21%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	27.59%	8.58%	+19.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	33.17%	14.70%	+18.47%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.17%	15.49%	+17.68%

CHPY vs. QYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

CHPY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than QYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

CHPY vs. QYLD - Dividend Comparison

CHPY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 28.40%, more than QYLD's 11.46% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CHPY YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF	28.40%	28.19%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF	11.46%	11.55%	12.50%	11.78%	13.75%	12.85%	11.16%	9.84%	12.44%	7.69%	9.15%	9.42%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CHPY and QYLD in my portfolio?

CHPY and QYLD have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CHPY or QYLD?

CHPY has higher volatility (11.23%) compared to QYLD (1.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CHPY dropped -12.17% vs QYLD's -24.75%.

Which ETF is better, CHPY or QYLD?

On 1-year performance, CHPY leads with 149.72% vs 23.93% for QYLD. On fees, QYLD is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, QYLD has been the lower-risk option at 1.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CHPY or QYLD?

Over the 1-year period, CHPY has performed better with a 149.72% return vs 23.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CHPY or QYLD?

QYLD is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for CHPY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CHPY or QYLD?

CHPY has the higher dividend yield at 28.40%, compared with 11.46% for QYLD.

What is the main difference between CHPY and QYLD?

CHPY is categorized as Derivative Income, while QYLD is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for CHPY and 0.60% for QYLD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CHPY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.47 vs 2.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.