CHPX vs. URA
CHPX (Global X AI Semiconductor & Quantum ETF) and URA (Global X Uranium ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CHPX is a Artificial Intelligence fund tracking the Global X AI Semiconductor & Quantum Index, while URA is a Uranium fund tracking the Solactive Global Uranium & Nuclear Components Total Return Index. Both are passively managed. Their 0.60 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. CHPX charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for URA.
Performance
CHPX vs. URA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CHPX achieves a 60.49% return, which is significantly higher than URA's -8.57% return.
CHPX
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- -8.69%
- 6M
- 45.81%
- YTD
- 60.49%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
URA
- 1D
- -1.64%
- 1M
- -9.62%
- 6M
- -28.95%
- YTD
- -8.57%
- 1Y
- 7.10%
- 3Y*
- 25.57%
- 5Y*
- 18.90%
- 10Y*
- 14.85%
- ALL TIME*
- -3.36%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $4.80M | $5.31M | $11.57M | |
| $122.45M | $118.35M | $170.14M |
CHPX vs. URA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CHPX Global X AI Semiconductor & Quantum ETF | 60.49% | 6.91% |
URA Global X Uranium ETF | -8.57% | -6.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between CHPX and URA is 0.60, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2025 | 0.60 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CHPX vs. URA — Risk / Return Rank
CHPX
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
URA
CHPX vs. URA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X AI Semiconductor & Quantum ETF (CHPX) and Global X Uranium ETF (URA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CHPX | URA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.06 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.10 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 0.22 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CHPX vs. URA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CHPX drawdown since its inception was -27.10%, smaller than the maximum URA drawdown of -93.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHPX and URA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CHPX | URA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.10% | -93.54% | +66.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -39.30% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -39.30% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -39.30% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -61.45% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.92% | -55.66% | +34.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.30% | -74.75% | +69.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 18.11% | — |
Volatility
CHPX vs. URA - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CHPX | URA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 13.54% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 38.35% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.96% | 52.24% | -7.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.96% | 44.10% | +0.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 44.96% | 38.10% | +6.86% |
CHPX vs. URA - Expense Ratio Comparison
CHPX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than URA's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
CHPX vs. URA - Dividend Comparison
CHPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%, less than URA's 5.33% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHPX Global X AI Semiconductor & Quantum ETF | 0.04% | 0.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
URA Global X Uranium ETF | 5.33% | 4.88% | 2.86% | 6.07% | 0.76% | 5.84% | 1.69% | 1.66% | 0.44% | 2.03% | 7.28% | 1.96% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CHPX and URA have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CHPX is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CHPX is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for URA.
URA has the higher dividend yield at 5.33%, compared with 0.04% for CHPX.
CHPX is categorized as Artificial Intelligence, while URA is Uranium. CHPX tracks Global X AI Semiconductor & Quantum Index, while URA tracks Solactive Global Uranium & Nuclear Components Total Return Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for CHPX and 0.69% for URA.
Find the right allocation for CHPX and URA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer