CHPX vs. THNQ
CHPX (Global X AI Semiconductor & Quantum ETF) and THNQ (ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF) are both Artificial Intelligence funds - CHPX tracks the Global X AI Semiconductor & Quantum Index while THNQ tracks the ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.85 means they have usually moved in the same direction. CHPX charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for THNQ.
Performance
CHPX vs. THNQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CHPX achieves a 60.49% return, which is significantly higher than THNQ's 33.15% return.
CHPX
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- -8.69%
- 6M
- 45.81%
- YTD
- 60.49%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
THNQ
- 1D
- 1.65%
- 1M
- -4.13%
- 6M
- 31.35%
- YTD
- 33.15%
- 1Y
- 55.63%
- 3Y*
- 30.82%
- 5Y*
- 14.49%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 21.75%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $4.80M | $5.31M | $11.57M | |
| $1.82M | $1.71M | $2.47M |
CHPX vs. THNQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CHPX Global X AI Semiconductor & Quantum ETF | 60.49% | 6.91% |
THNQ ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF | 33.15% | -0.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between CHPX and THNQ is 0.85, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2025 | 0.85 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CHPX vs. THNQ — Risk / Return Rank
CHPX
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
THNQ
CHPX vs. THNQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X AI Semiconductor & Quantum ETF (CHPX) and ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF (THNQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CHPX | THNQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.28 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.78 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 7.92 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CHPX vs. THNQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CHPX drawdown since its inception was -27.10%, smaller than the maximum THNQ drawdown of -50.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHPX and THNQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CHPX | THNQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.10% | -50.56% | +23.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -18.39% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -29.88% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -50.56% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.92% | -9.60% | -11.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.30% | -14.88% | +9.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 6.45% | — |
Volatility
CHPX vs. THNQ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CHPX | THNQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 9.75% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 24.75% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.96% | 30.08% | +14.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.96% | 29.80% | +15.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 44.96% | 28.97% | +15.99% |
CHPX vs. THNQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
CHPX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than THNQ's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
CHPX vs. THNQ - Dividend Comparison
CHPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%, less than THNQ's 0.15% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
CHPX Global X AI Semiconductor & Quantum ETF | 0.04% | 0.06% |
THNQ ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF | 0.15% | 0.20% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CHPX and THNQ have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CHPX is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CHPX is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for THNQ.
THNQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.15%, compared with 0.04% for CHPX.
CHPX tracks Global X AI Semiconductor & Quantum Index, while THNQ tracks ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Exchange Traded Concepts. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for CHPX and 0.68% for THNQ.
Find the right allocation for CHPX and THNQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer